User:Moverton/Sandbox
|
|
This is a test page.
Grenville Dodge [1] (http://www.dodgefamily.org/GrenvilleMellonDodge.shtml)
28140 Kansas City, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical Area 28140 20059 Franklin County, KS 28140 20091 Johnson County, KS 28140 20103 Leavenworth County, KS 28140 20107 Linn County, KS 28140 20121 Miami County, KS 28140 20209 Wyandotte County, KS 28140 29013 Bates County, MO 28140 29025 Caldwell County, MO 28140 29037 Cass County, MO 28140 29047 Clay County, MO 28140 29049 Clinton County, MO 28140 29095 Jackson County, MO 28140 29107 Lafayette County, MO 28140 29165 Platte County, MO 28140 29177 Ray County, MO
[2] (http://mcdc2.missouri.edu/webrepts/sf3pros/ksindex.html) [3] (http://www.census.gov/population/cencounts/ks190090.txt) [4] (http://kotn.org/colleges.html) [5] (http://www.ksgovernor.org/kansas_facts.html) [6] (http://kotn.org/kslinks.html) [7] (http://www.ksdot.org/burtransplan/maps/Mapscities.htm)
Map_of_USA.png
| Contents |
|
2.1 Background: The Clear Skies Initiative |
Counties in Kansas
See also
External links
- The Establishment of Counties in Kansas (http://skyways.lib.ks.us/genweb/archives/county/index.html)—Maps and text transcribed from Transactions of the Kansas State Historical Society, 1903-1904.
[[Category:Lists of U.S. counties|Kansas]] [[Category:Kansas counties| ]]
Clear Skies Act of 2003
The Clear Skies Act of 2003 is a proposed federal law of the United States. The official title as introduced is "a bill to amend the Clean Air Act to reduce air pollution through expansion of cap and trade programs, to provide an alternative regulatory classification for units subject to the cap and trade program, and for other purposes."
The bill's Senate version (S. 485) was sponsored by James Inhofe of Oklahoma and George Voinovich of Ohio; the House version (H.R. 999) was sponsored by Joe Barton of Texas and Billy Tauzin of Louisiana. Both versions were introduced on February 27, 2003; all of the sponsors of the bill were Republicans. The bill is currently in committee.
Upon introduction of the bill, Inhofe said, "Moving beyond the confusing, command-and-control mandates of the past, Clear Skies cap-and-trade system harnesses the power of technology and innovation to bring about significant reductions in harmful pollutants." The Clear Skies Act came about as the result of President Bush's Clear Skies Initiative.
Background: The Clear Skies Initiative
On February 14, 2002 President George W. Bush announced the Clear Skies Initiative.[8] (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/20020214-5.html) The policy was put together by Jim Connaughton, Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality, and involved the work of Senators Bob Smith and George Voinovich and Congressmen Billy Tauzin and Joe Barton. The Initiative is based on a central idea: "that economic growth is key to environmental progress, because it is growth that provides the resources for investment in clean technologies." The resulting proposal was a market-based cap-and-trade approach which intends to legislate power plant emissions caps without specifying the specific methods used to reach those caps. The Initiative would reduce the cost and complexity of compliance and the need for litigation.
Current power plant emissions amounted to 67% of all sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions (in the United States), 37% of mercury emissions, and 25% of all nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Only SO2 has been administered under a cap-and-trade program.
The goals of the Initiative are three-fold:
- Cut SO2 emissions by 73%, from emissions of 11 million tons to a cap of 4.5 million tons in 2010, and 3 million tons in 2018.
- Cut NOx emissions by 67%, from emissions of 5 million tons to a cap of 2.1 million tons in 2008, and to 1.7 million tons in 2018.
- Cut mercury emissions by 69%, from emissions of 48 tons to a cap of 26 tons in 2010, and 15 tons in 2018.
- Actual emissions caps would be set to account for different air quality needs in the East and West.
Through the use of a market-based cap-and-trade program, the Initiative would reward innovation, reduce costs, and guarantee results. Each power plant facility would be required to have a permit for each ton of pollution emitted. Because the permits are tradeable, companies would have a financial incentive to cut back their emissions using newer technologies.
The Initiative was modeled on the successful SO2 emissions trading program in effect since 1995. According to the President, the program had reduced air pollution more than all other programs under the Clean Air Act of 1990 combined. Actual reductions were more than the law required and compliance was virtually 100% without the need for litigation. Also, he said that only a "handful" of employees were needed to administer the program. The total cost to achieve the reductions was about 80% less than had originally been expected.
Bush mentioned several benefits of the Initiative:
- Reduces respiratory and cardiovascular diseases by dramatically reducing smog, fine particles, and regional haze.
- Protects wildlife, habitats and ecosystem health from acid rain, nitrogen and mercury deposition.
- Cuts pollution further, faster, cheaper, and with more certainty—replacing a cycle of endless litigation with rapid and certain improvements in air quality.
- Saves as much as $1 billion annually in compliance costs that are passed along to consumers.
- Protects the reliability and affordability of electricity.
- Encourages use of new and cleaner pollution control technologies.
Provisions of the bill
Competing proposals
In May 2004 the Energy Information Administration (EIA) released a study comparing the Clear Skies Act with the Clean Air Planning Act of 2003 (S. 843), introduced by Senator Thomas Carper, and the Clean Power Act of 2003 (S. 366), introduced by Senator James Jeffords.
The differences between the three bills are summarized as follows:
- Carbon dioxide emissions: While all three bills implement emissions targets on power sector emissions of NOx, SO2, and mercury, the Clean Air Planning Act and the Clean Power Act also call for limits on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Under the Clean Air Planning Act, greenhouse gas emission reductions outside of the power sector, referred to as offsets, can be used to meet the emission targets for CO2.
- Size of generators covered: All three bills cover emissions from larger generators that generate power for sale, including central station generators and generators at customer sites that sell power they do not use for their own needs. The Clear Skies and Clean Air Planning Acts cover generating facilities 25 megawatts and larger, while the Clean Power Act covers facilities 15 megawatts and larger. The bills have differing provisions regarding the coverage of combined heat and power facilities that generate some power for sale.
- Emissions caps: The bills generally rely on emissions cap and trade programs to achieve the required reductions. Under such programs, allowances will be allocated and covered generators will have to submit one allowance for each unit of emissions they produce. However, for mercury, the Clean Air Planning Act combines a minimum removal target for all plants with an emissions cap, and the Clean Power Act specifies a maximum emissions rate for all facilities and allows no trading of mercury allowances. The Clear Skies Act contains a "safety valve" feature that caps the price that power companies would have to pay for mercury ($2,187.50 per ounce or $35,000 per pound), SO2 ($4,000 per ton), and NOx ($4,000 per ton) allowances. Should one or more of these "safety valves" be triggered, the corresponding cap on emissions would effectively be relaxed.
- Emissions allocation: Under the Clear Skies Act, emission allowances are to be allocated based on historical fuel consumption, what is often referred to as "grandfathering". Under the Clean Air Planning Act, a grandfathering approach is used to allocate emission allowances for SO2, but allowances for NOx, mercury, and CO2, are allocated using an output-based scheme. Under this approach, referred to as a generation performance standard (GPS), generators are given allowances for each unit of electricity they generate. The number of allowances allocated for each unit of generation changes each year as the total generation from covered sources changes. The use of a GPS dampens the electricity price impacts of the bill but raises overall compliance costs.
- Control technology: In addition to the emission caps, the Clean Power Act also requires that all plants have the best available control technology (BACT) beginning in 2014 or when they reach 40 years of age, whichever comes later. This provision, often referred to as a "birthday" provision, requires older plants to add controls even if the total emissions of covered facilities are below the emission caps.
Analysis of the Three Bills:
- Clear Skies Act (Inhofe): To comply with the provisions of this bill, power generators are expected to rely primarily on adding emissions control equipment to existing generators. Switching fuels from coal to natural gas and renewables is projected to play a relatively small role. Power generators are expected to reduce their mercury emissions prior to 2010 to take advantage of the early credit program. However, the use of early credits allows them to delay meeting the 2010 34-ton mercury emissions cap until 2013. In the longer term, because of the mercury safety valve, mercury emissions are projected to remain above the 15-ton emission target that takes effect in 2018 throughout the projections. SO2 emissions are projected to approach the target, but because of allowance banking in the early phases, the 3-million-ton cap is not reached by 2025. The resource cost (the cost to the electric generation industry) and the electricity price impacts are the lowest among the three bills considered.
- Clean Air Planning Act (Carper): The addition of emissions control equipment to existing generators is also expected to play an important role in complying with this bill. However, because of the tighter emissions limits on SO2, NOx, and Hg and the addition of a CO2 emissions cap, fuel switching from coal to natural gas and renewables is projected to be much more important than under the Clear Skies Act. The impacts are very sensitive to the availability and cost of greenhouse gas offsets. The Clean Air Planning Act calls for the establishment of an independent review board to evaluate potential greenhouse offsets, but the criteria they might use are uncertain. Because of this uncertainty two separate cases were prepared. One case, Carper Domestic, assumes that only domestic offset programs will be approved, while another, Carper International, assumes both domestic and international offsets will be available. These cases illustrate the sensitivity of the results to the cost and availability of greenhouse gas offsets, but may not span the full range of possible outcomes.
If greenhouse gas offsets are fairly inexpensive, they will be the primary option for meeting the CO2 emissions limit. The more expensive are greenhouse offsets, the larger will be the role of switching fuels from coal to natural gas and renewables. The output-based allowance allocation scheme used in the Clean Air Planning Act does dampen the electricity price impacts, but it leads to higher resource costs. Overall, the resource cost and electricity price impacts of this bill are projected to be larger than those under the Clear Skies Act.
- Clean Power Act (Jeffords): Under this bill the relatively stringent CO2 emissions cap is projected to make switching from coal to natural gas, renewables, and nuclear especially important. The birthday provision causes many older plants to add emissions control equipment, even though the emissions of SO2, NOx, and Hg are projected to fall below their respective targets once power companies switch away from coal. A large number of new small generators and combined heat and power facilities are built because they are not covered by the bill’s emissions caps. However, the bill reduces the emission caps for large generators to offset emissions from these sources. The early timing and stringency of the emissions limits combined with the birthday provision in this bill lead to the largest resource cost and electricity price impacts among the three bills. Because of the higher projected electricity prices, consumers are also expected to reduce their use of electricity.
Criticisms
External links
- Press release: President Announces Clear Skies & Global Climate Change Initiatives (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/20020214-5.html)
- Testimony before the U.S. Senate subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate Change, and Nuclear Safety (April 8, 2003): James E. Rogers, Chairman, President & CEO of Cinergy Corp. (http://epw.senate.gov/108th/Rogers_040803.htm)
- Remarks by U.S. Senator Thomas R. Carper
Senate Environment and Public Works Services Committee Confirmation hearing for Governor Michael Leavitt as the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency Thursday, September 18th, 2003 [9] (http://epw.senate.gov/108th/Carper_092303.htm)[10] (http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=212522)
- Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate Change, and Nuclear Safety. Hearings on the Clear Skies Act of 2003, S. 485: April 8, 2003 (http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=213451); May 8, 2003 (http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=213323); June 5, 2003 (http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=213249)
- Energy Information Administration (EIA): Analysis of Clear Skies, Clean Air Planning, and Power Act of 2003 (http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/servicerpt/csa/)
- Clear Skies Act of 2003 - Amends the acid deposition control provisions of the Clean Air Act with respect to emissions limitations and allowances programs for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury by: (1) revising the allowance system and associated transfer, tracking, permit, compliance plan, and penalty requirements, including those for auctions; and (2) establishing new emissions limitations and trading programs (including implementation of a separate sulfur dioxide scheme for States in the Western Regional Air Partnership).
- Requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to: (1) promulgate performance standards (limiting emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and mercury) for new boilers, integrated gasification combined cycle plants, and combustion turbines; and (2) conduct a comprehensive research and environmental assessment program to enhance understanding of health and environmental effects of particulate matter and mercury and to demonstrate the efficacy of emission reductions under this Act.
- Excludes the following units from consideration as major emitting facilities or major stationary sources (or parts thereof) for purposes of compliance with provisions concerning prevention of significant deterioration of air quality and plan requirements for nonattainment areas: (1) those that are subject to the performance standards of this Act; or (2) those with properly operated and maintained equipment to limit particulate matter emissions or subject to a permit under an applicable implementation plan that provides a specified particulate matter emissions limitation and that use good combustion practices to minimize carbon monoxide emissions.
- Requires States to ensure in implementation plans that: (1) in an attainment or unclassifiable area, any emissions increase from the construction or modification of an affected unit will not result in exceeding a national ambient air quality standard; and (2) in a nonattainment area, the emissions increase will not interfere with a program to assure the achievement of such a standard. Provides for designation of transitional areas under implementation plans and states requirements for emissions inventories, the attainment of standards by the end of 2015, and penalties for not meeting the eight-hour ozone or fine particles standard.
- S.1844
- Clear Skies Act of 2003 - Amends the acid deposition control provisions of the Clean Air Act with respect to emissions limitations and allowances programs for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury by: (1) revising the allowance system and associated transfer, tracking, permit, compliance plan, and penalty requirements, including those for auctions; and (2) establishing new emissions limitations and trading programs (including implementation of a separate sulfur dioxide scheme for States in the Western Regional Air Partnership).
- Requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to: (1) promulgate performance standards (limiting emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and mercury) for new boilers, integrated gasification combined cycle plants, and combustion turbines; and (2) conduct a comprehensive research and environmental assessment program to enhance understanding of health and environmental effects of particulate matter and mercury and to demonstrate the efficacy of emission reductions under this Act.
- Excludes the following units from consideration as major emitting facilities or major stationary sources (or parts thereof) for purposes of compliance with provisions concerning prevention of significant deterioration of air quality and plan requirements for nonattainment areas: those that achieve a specified limit on particulate matter emissions or certain national emissions standards for hazardous pollutants or those with properly operated and maintained equipment to limit particulate matter emissions and that use good combustion practices to minimize carbon monoxide emissions.
- Establishes procedures by which owners or operators may petition the Secretary of Energy for a determination that electricity reliability will likely be threatened by the need to install pollution control technology. Allows a compliance delay in the case of a successful petition.
- Requires States to ensure in implementation plans that: (1) in an attainment or unclassifiable area, any emissions increase from the construction or modification of an affected unit will not result in exceeding a national ambient air quality standard; and (2) in a nonattainment area, the emissions increase will not interfere with a program to assure the achievement of such a standard. Provides for designation of transitional areas under implementation plans and states requirements for emissions inventories, the attainment of standards by the end of 2015, and penalties for not meeting the eight-hour ozone or fine particles standard.
The law repeals or reduces air pollution controls, including those environmental protections of the Clean Air Act, including caps on toxic chemicals in the air and funding cuts for enforcement. The Act is opposed by conservationist groups such as the Sierra Club with Henry A. Waxman, a Democratic congressman of California, describing its title as "clear propaganda."
Among other things, the Clear Skies Act:
- Weakens the current cap on mercury pollution levels from five tons per year to 26 tons.
- Weakens the current cap on nitrogen oxide pollution levels from 1.25 million tons to 2.1 million tons, allowing 68 percent more NOx pollution.
- Weakens the current cap on sulphur dioxide pollution levels from two million tons to 4.5 million tons, allowing 225 percent more SO2 pollution.
- Delays enforcement of smog-and-soot pollution standards until 2015.
- Allows industrial buildings undergoing renovation, modernization, or expansion not to install machines that allow the building to come into current environmental standards compliance.
By 2018, the Clear Skies Act would allow 450,000 more tons of NOx, one million more tons of SO2, and 9.5 more tons of mercury than what would be allowed by enforcement of the Clean Air Act.
Presidential election issues
Issue stances
George W. Bush, as well as his Democrat opponent John F. Kerry, has refused, on 23 separate occasions, to respond to Project Vote Smart's National Political Awareness Test.[11] (http://www.vote-smart.org/npat.php?can_id=CNIP9043)
Abortion
President Bush opposes abortion. In his words, "The promises of our Declaration of Independence are not just for the strong, the independent, or the healthy. They are for everyone -- including unborn children. We are a society with enough compassion and wealth and love to care for both mothers and their children, to see the promise and potential in every human life."
Community Aid
President Bush established the Office of Faith Based and Community Initiatives, which allows the federal government to fund community aid programs that are provided by a religious institution. He has proposed a youth mentoring program for disadvantaged students and children of prisoners.
Economy
Bush supports making the tax cuts passed during his first term permanent; he maintains that they made the recession shallower than it would have been.
Education
President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act, which requires mandatory standardized testing, forces schools that do not meet standards to provide alternate options for students, and attempts to close the race and gender gap in schools. His FY 2005 budget proposes a 49% increase in elementary and secondary education compared to the FY 2001 budget.
Bush also proposed the following:
- Provide $250 million in annual funding to extend state assessments in reading and math.
- Include 12th graders in the National Assessment of Educational Progress.
- Establish a $200 million fund to encourage schools to use testing to develop performance plans for entering high school students and to monitor their progress.
- Increase funding for the Striving Readers initiative (a high school reading program), for advanced placement courses for low-income students, and to provide professional development for teachers.
- Expand the State Scholars program.
- Direct $1 billion in annual funding from the Perkins Vocational Education program into a new Secondary and Technical Education program. Participating vocational schools would offer four years of English, three years of math and science, and three-and-a-half years of social studies as part of their curriculum.
- Provide an incentive fund to reward effective teachers.
- Increase loan forgiveness for qualified teachers.
- Expand access to web-based programs and distance learning.
- Improve adult literacy using a comprehensive web-based literacy tool.
- Under the Personal Reemployment Accounts pilot program, provide certain unemployed workers with up to $3,000 that could be used for training and services, such as child care and transportation.
Environment
President Bush's Clear Skies Act repeals or reduces air pollution controls, including environmental protections of the Clean Air Act. His FY 2005 budget provides $4.4 billion for conservation programs. He signed legislation pushing for the cleanup of abandoned industrial sites (also known as brownfields) and keeping forest fires at bay. He was under criticsm for rejecting the Kyoto Protocol which would commit the United States to reducing greenhouse gas emissions which are believed to cause global warming. The Bush administration has stated that this would cost the economy up to $400 billion.
Homeland security
After the September 11th terrorist attacks, President Bush signed the USA PATRIOT Act and created the Department of Homeland Security. He also created the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC) and the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC). Is currently promoting the idea of an independent "Czar of Intelligence" outside of the White House in response to the 9/11 Commission's findings.
National security and foreign policy
Presient Bush submitted his National Security Strategy of the United States . The "three pillars" of this are to
- Defend the peace by working against terrorists and terrorist-tolerating regimes
- Preserve the peace by maintaing relations with allies and reaching out to nations to combat terrorism.
- Extend the peace by spreading democracy and human rights across the globe.
The White House looks at five nations as successes in his foreign policy.
Afghanistan
Supports continued American involvement in Afghanistan at the request of the government. Believes President Hamid Karzai that Afghanistan is making progress.
Libya
In a series of negotiations which involved Libya, Britain, and the United States, Libya turned over materials that are necessary to the production of nuclear weapons.
Iraq
Supports continued American presence in Iraq at the request of the Iraq interim government. Promotes having democratic elections by January of 2005.
Pakistan
Pakistan's border with Afghanistan places that nation in a strategic location. Pakistan has cooperated with the United States since the September 11th attacks, arresting suspected terrorists and providing intelligence on terrorist plans and communications.
Saudi Arabia
President Bush is putting pressure on the Saudi Royal Family to directly combat terrorism and to seize the assets of terrorists operating within their borders.
Same-sex marriage and gay rights
President Bush has a strong belief in "protecting the sanctity of marriage." He does not support gay marriage and has been pushing for an amendment banning same-sex marriage.
2004 in comics
Diamond (http://www.diamondcomics.com/shipping.asp)Marvel (http://marvel.com/catalog/index.htm)DC (http://dccomics.com/comics/index.html)Image (http://www.imagecomics.com/)Top Cow (http://topcow.com/)CrossGen (http://www.crossgen.com/company/onsale/onsale.asp)bankrupt (http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb258/is_200407/ai_hibm1G1119185004)
Publications by release date
Released July 7, 2004
- Comic books
- Alpha Flight (2004 series) #5 — Marvel Comics (Rating: PSR (http://marvel.com/catalog/ratings.htm))
- COVER BY: Clayton Henry; WRITER: Scott Lobdell; PENCILS: Clayton Henry; INKS: Mark Morales
- Alpha Flight (2004 series) #5 — Marvel Comics (Rating: PSR (http://marvel.com/catalog/ratings.htm))
- COVER BY: Steve Epting; WRITER: Christopher Priest; PENCILS: Joe Bennett; INKS: Jack Jadson
- COVER BY: Mizuki Sakakibara; WRITER: Tony Bedard; PENCILS: James Calafiore; INKS: Mark McKenna
- COVER BY: Scott Kolins; WRITER: Allan Jacobsen; PENCILS: C. P. Smith; INKS: C. P. Smith
- A new limited series by Robert Rodi with artwork by Esad Ribic.
- COVER BY: Makoto Nakatsuka; WRITER: Sean McKeever; PENCILS: Alitha Martinez; INKS: David Newbold
- COVER BY: Michael Ryan; WRITER: Todd Dezago; PENCILS: Jonboy Meyers; INKS: Pat Davidson
- Features a new cover by Salvador Larroca and digital painting by Richard Isanove.
- COVER BY: Ronald Frenz; WRITER: Tom DeFalco; PENCILS: Ronald Frenz; INKS: Sal Buscema
- Separate stories by Robert Kirkman (Captain America), with Cory Walker (Invincible), and the creative team of Allan Jacobsen and C. P. Smith (from the upcoming New Invaders series). Cover is by Erik Larsen.
- A new ongoing series by sci-fi author Kevin J. Anderson with art by Alé Garza.
- COVER BY: Ron Lim; WRITER: Keith Giffen; PENCILS: Ron Lim; INKS: Al Milgrom
- COVER BY: Steve Epting; WRITER: Michael Oeming; PENCILS: Andrea Di Vito
- COVER BY: Mark Bagley; WRITER: Brian Michael Bendis; PENCILS: Mark Bagley; INKS: Scott Hanna
- COVER BY: Alan Davis; WRITER: Chris Claremont; PENCILS: Alan Davis; INKS: Mark Farmer
Released July 14, 2004
- Comic books
- Guardians (2004 series) #1 — Marvel Comics (Rating: PSR)
- A new ongoing series by Marc Sumerak with artwork by Casey Jones.
- Guardians (2004 series) #1 — Marvel Comics (Rating: PSR)
Released July 21, 2004
- Comic books
- Loki #2 (of 4) — Marvel Comics (Rating: PSR+)
- Man-Thing #1 (of 3) — Marvel Comics (Rating: PSR+)
- A new limited series movie "prequel" by screenwriter Hans Rodionoff with artwork by Kyle Hotz.
- Featuring a cover by Tommy Ohtsuka and art by Jorge Lucas.
Sample table formatting
|
[[Image:|thumb|250px|center|Air Force One flying over Mount Rushmore.]] | |
| Name: | Air Force One |
| Primary function: | Presidential air transport |
| Contractor: | Boeing |
| Power plant: | Four General Electric CF6-80C2B1 jet engines |
| Thrust: | 56,700 lb per engine |
| Length: | 231 ft, 10 in (70.7 m) |
| Height: | 63 ft, 5 in (19.3 m) |
| Wingspan: | 195 ft, 8 in (59.6 m) |
| Speed: | 630 mph (Mach 0.92) |
| Ceiling: | 45,100 ft (13,746 m) |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight: | 833,000 lb (374,850 km) |
| Range: | 7,800 statute miles (6,800 nautical miles or 12,550 km) |
| Crew: | 26 |
| Total capacity: | 102 |
| Introduction: | December 8, 1990 (No. 28000) December 23, 1990 (No. 29000) |
| Deployment: | September 6, 1990 (No. 28000) March 26, 1991 (No. 29000) |
| Inventory: | 2 |
Football
Regular season
For quarterbacks:
| Abbreviations:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For runningbacks:
| Abbreviations:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Playoffs
For quarterbacks:
| Abbreviations:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For runningbacks:
| Abbreviations:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||