User talk:Diberri
|
|
User:Diberri/Talk page navigation
| Contents |
Reverting 67.175.84.210
Thanks for the revert of 67.175.84.210 - whom I have given a 24 hour block. --Uncle Ed (El Dunce) 13:18, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Tools
It's OK - various internal server errors are normal (well, not normal, but at least expected) - the tools stuff is still pretty alpha quality right now. It'd run out of SQL connections due to a resource leak allocating them and not freeing them... perhaps once I'm done rewriting it it'll be a bit more stable :-) — Kate Turner | Talk 10:47, 2004 Nov 4 (UTC) (And they say Java has automatic garbage collection...)
Michael Collins image
Hiya. Thanks for the messsage. From what I can discover no-one knows who took the original picture. It may belong to one of the many defunct Irish newspapers or have been taken by a private citizen but whomever took it is unknown. Because of its age (it was taken before the end of August 1922), the inability of anyone to find who took it and because no-one has ever claimed copyright (if they did, given its widespread usage they would be very very rich) it is universally presumed either to be out of copyright (expired), lost copyright (ie, the descendants of the copyright holder don't know they hold it, and as its origins are unclear they are all but certain never to be able establish legally that they hold copyright) or been seen through usage as entitled to be used without copyright restrictions.
As an example of how widespread this image is, I've just passed a Sinn Fein office where it is displayed in a poster. I have seen it in the Fine Gael headquarters, it is widely used by all Irish newspapers, history book, reference manuals, etc. It is even on the wall of the internet cafe I am in right now. Not one of the sources have sought copyright permission to use it (I've asked. They say they don't know who even to approach about it, so unclear is its origins!) If wikipedia was to be challenged as to copyright they would find themselves in a queue behind just about every Irish publisher, every author, every political party, every publisher of posters and about three million Irish people. It would find itself in the company of HMSO (Her Majesty's Stationery Office), and state publications in the US, the EU, the UK, the RoI, Fianna Fail, Fine Gael, Sinn Fein, the SDLP, the Ulster Unionist Party, etc etc. If it ever turns up that someone claims and can establish that they own copyright the image can be removed immediately. But from I can understand from everyone I have checked with, the chances of anyone establishing that are slim. And even if they did, the nature of its usage for over fifty years would make the chances of they being able to enforce copyright so slim as to be non-existent.
I hope that clarifies matters. FearÉIREANN 17:31, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
192.197.71.189
I've banned him twice now, and he keeps on editing. What the hell is going on? JFW | T@lk 18:05, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- His contribs are mixed up occasionally with another editor's Sandbox stuff. Mediawiki is being enigmatic... JFW | T@lk 18:07, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Please also ask the developers why I keep on getting two different sets of contributions. The blocking was completely inefficient - the vandal may just have gone to the kitchen to microwave his pizza and pop a can of beer, and will be back in 5 minutes :-{. JFW | T@lk 18:13, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Indeed, his recent edits were being hidden sometimes. But the blocking bug is truly serious! JFW | T@lk 18:39, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Image:MichaelCoats.jpg
At you request I have Posted that the image came from the NASA and is a government photo in the public domain. -- Quinwound 07:01, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks (re medical school article)
Hi Big Dave,
Thanks for your message! :-)
Medical education is so diverse across the world - both from country to country and from university to university - so no one article is going to easily cover the full range. Rather, I have attempted to keep the article broad whilst giving a few examples.
Post-graduate career pathways also vary considerably from place to place, eg nations like the USA have an earlier streaming process, whilst nations such as Australian or the UK have a greater emphasis on early undifferentiated practice before moving into a longer specialisation process. However, I decided that the medical school article was not the place for this, and so only left broad information.
I see you are seeking entry into a medical program - best of luck if you have not already attained this!
Cheers, --DaveB 05:15, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Scientific Method
The internal link you removed is not a link to the top of the article. It serves as a convenience to arrive at the core of the article. Ancheta Wis 22:45, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- The MoS says The use of so-called "free links" to other topics, for example, George W. Bush, is encouraged. Use the links for all words and terms that are relevant to your article.
- And certainly Prediction is central to the Scientific Method Ancheta Wis 00:32, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Withvision etc
You're quite welcome, and thank you for working and keeping an eye on such things. Feel free to let me know if you see some old problem you think is overdue for action. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 22:04, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Image:MichelineBernardini.jpg
I have answered to your question as much as I could. -Hapsiainen 20:20, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
You shouldn't have put the image on the Possibly unfree images list. It is only for images that are both unfree and break the fair use rules. To make sure of its fair use status, I listed it on Wikipedia:Copyright problems#Fair use claims needing a second opinion. Could you remove the image from Possibly unfree images list? -Hapsiainen 14:14, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
- And the page really is only for such images, although it isn't explained clearly enouh. See Wikipedia talk:Possibly unfree images#What if fair use can be claimed? -Hapsiainen 20:51, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
- I already explained the most important reason for the fair use status in Copyright problems page. Now I have written a very elaborate explanation in the image description page. -Hapsiainen 00:19, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
Category:NMDA antagonists to Category:NMDAR antagonists
I was tempted to make the change you made but I hesitated because the inexact expression "NMDA antagonist" is almost as common as the correct one in the scientific literature. Actually, if it were not a category, "NMDA antagonists" would have deserved a redirect to the correct article instead of mere deletion. So long, Delta G 18:56, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
FYI,
Google search "NMDA antagonist" site:ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&c2coff=1&as_qdr=all&q=+%22NMDA+antagonist%22+site%3Ancbi.nlm.nih.gov&btnG=Search&meta=) (6,000 results)
Googles search "NMDA receptor antagonist" site:ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&c2coff=1&as_qdr=all&q=+%22NMDA+receptor+antagonist%22+site%3Ancbi.nlm.nih.gov&btnG=Search&meta=) (9,960 results)
Google search "NMDAR antagonist" site:ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&safe=off&c2coff=1&as_qdr=all&q=+%22NMDAR+antagonist%22+site%3Ancbi.nlm.nih.gov&btnG=Search&meta=) (82 results)
regards, Delta G 20:43, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Until category redirection is supported, a very pseudo redirection: Category:NMDA_antagonists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:NMDA_antagonists). I had to use the external link trick.
bye, Delta G 00:54, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Wikifun round 4
Hi, I noticed that you competed in a previous round, so I just wanted to tell you that Round 4 of the Wikifun trivia quiz is now running... -- Eugene van der Pijll 22:40, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Perl#Built-in data types
Nice!
chocolateboy 11:26, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
man perl
Thanks for the offer. I found John McNamara's Pod-Simple-Wiki and adapted it to work with MediaWiki. See User: Tony Sidaway/Projects/man perl. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway Talk ]] 00:44, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Thanks
That template link (All pages... ) was what I was looking for. Hydnjo 01:20, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Image:Michelson interferometer schematic.png
Hi. I didnt originate that image. ;) -SV 21:43, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
LTP rewrite
Hi David, I finally got around to reading your LTP rewrite. I left a couple notes at Talk:Long-term potentiation. Thanks! AxelBoldt 01:32, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
G'day
You edited the page Desaparecidos_(band) ([1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Desaparecidos_%28band%29&oldid=5449021)), and i would like to know if you would have a problem with me deleating this page (as it is currently a redirect), then move what is currently at Desaparecidos (which is about the band) to the newly vacated space at Desaparecidos_(band), and then write a new article about Desaparecidos (the disappeared people in south america) at Desaparecidos? The bellman 03:13, 2004 Nov 30 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks a lot, i was planning on asking Ambi, but if you're an admin that's even better. Anyway, could you wait two or three more days, just to allow anyone to object on the Desaparecidos talk page. The bellman 01:49, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
- Well, i think that if it was something more controversial, then the requested moves might be the way to go, but, this is really pretty clear cut. The bellman 10:50, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
- Okay, i think we've given enough time. Let's do it. The bellman 01:17, 2004 Dec 3 (UTC)
- Done (i think). I'll add more to the main article over the next week. The bellman 11:25, 2004 Dec 3 (UTC)
- Okay, i think we've given enough time. Let's do it. The bellman 01:17, 2004 Dec 3 (UTC)
- Well, i think that if it was something more controversial, then the requested moves might be the way to go, but, this is really pretty clear cut. The bellman 10:50, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
Page view counts
Unfortunately not. The hit counts are produced from the Squid logs using webalizer, which is currently not being run because it puts too much of a strain on the servers. It's not possible to extract the number of hits from the database (due to caching, among other things). Regards — Kate Turner | Talk 22:36, 2004 Dec 5 (UTC)
Thank you for helping clean up Wiki Syntax
Just a quick note to say thank you for all your help with fixing Wiki Syntax (especially the huge number of HTML-table-attributes!). All the best, -- Nickj 05:21, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Web Template Edit
Hello Diberri. In regards to the web template edit, you said > "wikify, stubbify, rm ext. link ad/spam -- probably should merge with web design" Web Template is one of the new topics, I'm working on. I agree the article is a stub and needs more expanding. I don't think the link advert counts as spam however. Most importantly, a web template is totally different than web design. It is part of web design but a template is completely different therefore don't think it should be merged. sid007 08:07, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey, I noticed you changed from using {{NoMultiLicense}} to using {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}. Since the former template was created, the number of "opt-outs" has almost doubled. Thanks for changing your mind. -- – Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new)) (talk)[[]] 22:06, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
List of stars
- This category contains article about taxa about the family level in the order Anura - the frogs and toads. According to the Category:Frogs statement, only articles in the Family (biology) level of frogs should be there, not the genera or species level articles. If it were to be similar to the frogs category, then individual stars would still not appear on Category:Stars page. 132.205.94.190 00:45, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- see Category talk:Stars 132.205.94.190 00:18, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- discussion is extracted from various usertalk pages. 132.205.94.190 00:32, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- The category has been placed under WP:CFD 132.205.15.43 00:55, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Leopard frog, etc
- Since the Leopard Frog is miscategorized, there's gonna need to be cleanup in the Frogs category... (if you follow the statement of meaning on the Category Frongs page) Leopard Frog is a genus, not a family (Stars are individuals, not types as well, so Kermit the Frog is an individual, like say... Proxima Centauri, while binary star is a type, akin to family, genera, species... )132.205.94.190 00:50, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
RFC pages on VfD
Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:35, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm going to shift your comments to the new admin noticeboard... if you have any specific objections to this please let me know. - Ta bu shi da yu 22:29, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Special Thanks To ... (from Hydnjo)
- Flockmeal for your kind welcome. Hydnjo\talk 04:03, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- →Raul654 for your help with templates. Hydnjo\talk 04:03, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- David Iberri for your help in finding THE template list. Hydnjo\talk 04:03, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Catherine for your help with uploading images and making my signature look like I know what I'm doing. Hydnjo\talk 04:03, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- and →Raul|654 (again) for watchlisting HIS talk page and taking the time to respond. Hydnjo\talk 04:03, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
no problem
No problem, I didn't mind your edit to my user page, but, man, you've got wikiholism bad! I do too, and it sometimes actually interferes with my work, but I figure I could have worse problems... Take it easy ike9898 22:29, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
LTP question
Hi, i am a layman and i am not sure whether i understand this sentence right: Though a single presentation of the stimulus is USUALLY not sufficient to induce LTP, repeated presentations cause the postsynaptic cell to be progressively depolarized.
Does it mean that that some things are written to our memory completely by chance? that some quick glance can be stored in our memory just because of rigtht polarization of the postsynaptic cell? and on the other hand something we want to remember may not be joined by right polarization and therefore we just forget it?
thank you for a respond _t_rosival(snail)hotmail.com (it is from your article about LTP (early LTP))
- Thanks for your question. I've replied at Talk:Long-term potentiation. --David Iberri | Talk 18:22, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
Fraser Mustard
Hi,
Dr. Mustard is notable for many reasons (which are included in the article), in no particular order:
- He is a Companion of the Order of Canada. Canada's highest civilian award which is only presented to 130 or so living people.
- He received the Order of Ontario. A provincial equivalent to the Order of Canada.
- He is a co-founder of a medical school at one of Canada's significant universities, McMaster.
- He is well respected doctor and is a member of the Canadian Medical Hall of Fame
- He was involved in the study of Blood Coagulation
- There are currently 9,330 entries for "Fraser Mustard" in Google.
This seems to be enough. If you feel it isn't, it is your right to put this article up for a Vote for Deletion.
Thanks, --YUL89YYZ 19:50, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
Backpropagation
hello. Where on earth did you find Back-propagation. Not only that, but eventhough you're mature on wikipedia, you left a situation where Backpropagation redirect to back-propagation and back-propagation to Backpropagation (infinite loop my friend..)
I keeping the Backpropagation article and if you want Back-propagation can redirect to the Backpropagation article -- Nkour 20:27, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC) and your evil....i will keep vandilizing ur site if your gunna b like this
Reference desk
I have answered questions on the RD about the songs at the beginning of the CSI series, algebra, where to find the instruction manual for a Hitachi HB-B101 Bread Maker, where to find a service manual for a GMC Caballero, basic information about travelling to the Czech Republic, where to find reports of volcanic activity, how to get 220V out of a 110V breaker box, one about the theoretical maximum speed of CDs, and hazarded a guess at the nutritional value of mice and rats. And that is what hasn't been archived.
But at some point, you have to ask yourself what people are thinking. This "Tina" would have had to have expended much more effort finding the Reference desk than she would have in using a search engine to find it. Also, about the only way she is likely to have found it is by using a search engine, meaning she inexplicably did not search for what she was actually looking for. Add on top of that the "Urgently.", and I just lost it.
Message left here because this isn't on-topic for the RD. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:25, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Image:Streptococcus small.PNG
Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Streptococcus small.PNG. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell (talk) (help) 21:04, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
Image:OkolBialstoku.jpg
(Moved from User:Diberri/Image tag request)
And:
- Image:OkolBialstoku.jpg -- Kbh3rd 04:04, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
POV warrior + it's generally considered bad practice to link to other namepsaces from the main namespace
On reflection, I think I agree it is not an article candidate, but there is a growing usage there. Maybe it should be a wictionary entry? ---- Charles Stewart 00:04, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- But you already gave it an entry in Wikipedia:Glossary :-) It's Wikipedia-specific slang and doesn't really belong in Wikipedia or Wiktionary. --David Iberri | Talk 00:10, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Right you are. The creation of the article was to have a node to point to, but I guess WP:G does as well ---- Charles Stewart 00:22, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
You wrote: it's generally considered bad practice to link to other namepsaces from the main namespace abpout my linking to my homepage from the disambig page. Out of curiosity: where is this guideline? I have the idea I've done this in a few places. ---- Charles Stewart 01:01, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think there's a policy that literally says to avoid internamespace links from an article. But I think it follows from Wikipedia:Avoid self-references and its associated talk page. The idea is that user pages (and any other pages outside the main namespace) are not part of the encyclopedia itself; they're part of Wikipedia's editorial process and the reader shouldn't be taken there unexpectedly. (On the other hand, if a particular non-article page has a useful discussion, example, or explanation that's relevant to an article, then it's perfectly ok to link to it -- though there are probably better alternatives -- as long as one uses the external link syntax.) Best, David Iberri | Talk 06:37, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. There was another thing I wrote (on what is now Anti-Islamic sentiment and positions) that violated this policy (explicit charactersisation of editor's positions on the article in a NPOV sticker-like text), but it may have halted an edit war and it's now gone. ---- Charles Stewart 08:45, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- That's fine, IMO, but usually one of the boilerplate messages will suffice. --David Iberri | Talk 17:24, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Right, but in that context, which boilerplate texts could be put on was one of the fiercest bones of controversy. ---- Charles Stewart 17:30, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- True, choosing can be a bit contentious. What you did seems reasonable to me. --David Iberri | Talk 17:32, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
internet protocols
I removed some double assignments to the same category as "Instant Messaging" is a subcategory to "Internet Protocols".
Then revert my edits and attribute "Instant messaging" to a more appropriate category.
citation formatter
I like it and copied the link to one of my user pages. Thanks. alteripse 02:04, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Wiki
Thanks for removing the falsehood about WikiWikiWeb from the Wiki article. I have no idea how that crept into the article in the first place. Cheers! — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work</span> 19:09, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Category:Companies traded on NASDAQ
Hi Big Dave, I noticed that you responded to this at WP:HD. Just letting you know that Wikipedia:Template messages/All and Wikipedia:Template messages/Links are still there. If I knew how to help I would so let us know at WP:HD how you fixed it (for the next time). Thanks, hydnjo talk 19:26, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Copied from your user page
Use this patch to let the makefile actually install the html2wiki commandline helper script (sorry for jumping in here, but couldn't find an email address ;-) :
klippie HTML-WikiConverter # cat files/install-commandline.patch
--- Makefile.PL-orig 2005-05-20 00:47:07.000000000 +0200
+++ Makefile.PL 2005-06-18 16:28:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
WriteMakefile(
'NAME' => 'HTML::WikiConverter',
'VERSION_FROM' => 'WikiConverter.pm', # finds $VERSION
+ 'EXE_FILES' => ['bin/html2wiki', ],
'PREREQ_PM' => {
'HTML::Tree' => 3.18,
'URI' => 1.35,
Wikipedia:Mind Benders
Hello! I've noticed your past interest in Wikipedia:Mind Benders and wanted to share the following announcement with you! I've taken over the responsibilities of Mind Benders, and the page will now be regularly updated. Right now, the pre-round is open (it's more of a creative artistic competition), and round one will open soon (the questions are done, we just need to wait for the pre-round to begin/finish)! So why not check it out? I'll keep you updated! Thanks, Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 01:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
P.S. Feel free to pass this news on to other Wikipedians.