User talk:Chris K
|
|
| Contents |
Bmw3series.jpg
Would you be willing to develop the description of Bmw3series.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Bmw3series.jpg), consistent with the image use policy?
—Vespristiano 20:24, 2003 Dec 27 (UTC)
Chris, can you mention source of the image Missing image
Cateblanchett.jpg
Image:Cateblanchett.jpg
and any permission info on usage. Jay 00:58, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)
VfD formatting
Any comments for deletion should be added by pressing the add to this deletion debate link below the article title once it's been listed, rather than the edit link to the right. Other than that and the minor problem that mediawiki doesn't like dots, dashes, colons or any kind of grammar whatsoever I think you've got it sorted. -- Graham :) | Talk 21:33, 25 May 2004 (UTC)
Image:Michaelcaine.jpg
User:Diberri/Image tag request --David Iberri | Talk 19:56, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new)| talk)
Image:Georgepeppard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Georgepeppard.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Right now I'm marking it as unverified, correct it when you get the chance. Thanks, Mattingly23 04:00, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
