User talk:Vaganyik

Excellent! Another connoissur of Queen. Welcome aboard - I forsee that your input will be most useful. Power to the wiki! --maveric149

---

Hello, just wanted to welcome you to the project. I'm glad to see your enthusiasm, but--and sorry to start on a wrong foot--we try to avoid subjective statements on wikipedia. What I mean is that you mentioned Gwyneth Paltrow's "great" films and Grace Kelly's "masterful" performances, and those are opinions not everyone may agree with (film is a highly subjective medium). It is, however, fair game to mention what various critics thought of the actors, or how the acting was received at various film festivals or at the Oscars. Best, and keep contributing please, Koyaanis Qatsi

---

Hello again, the message was in the right place. Some users put theirs on the talk page--logically enough; my chitchat has just stayed on the main page where it started because I like it there. Anyway, don't worry about the adjectives, enthusiasm is not a bad thing. And my first few entries were much much worse than the ones you added; they tended to gush or rant, and I'm glad that they're lost now with the conversion to the new software.  :-D Koyaanis Qatsi

---

Thank you Vaganyik. I much appreciate your help and offer of help in future. I will be happy to use it. szopen

---

Vaganyik: Just to let you know, I have updated the Mozilla page with details of 1.1 and also a link to the Slashdot topic page for Mozilla. Is there any chance you could provide me with some Linux tips? I am a newbie and don't know where to start. Any tips would be welcome on my Talk Page. --Thanks, Metz2000.

---

Hi there, and welcome! Thought you should know I moved your Carol Ann Duffy page (she spells it with only one "l" in "Carol"). Mswake 12:13 Jan 8, 2003 (UTC)

---

Hi there. I've put italics back in the filml list on Natalie Portman -- films are always italicized even in lists. if you tihnk this is incorrect, mention it on the manual of style talk page. -- Tarquin 20:18 Jan 23, 2003 (UTC)

---

Mozilla update

Thanks for informing us 'Pedians of the update. I've read its new features and loved them. Downloaded it and installing now. --Menchi 20:56 May 9, 2003 (UTC)

---

Hello. Instead of long intro, see: user:grin/hu --grin 16:28 9 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit&section=new)| talk)