User talk:Stw
|
|
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
Nice job on fake book. I put it up as a stub hoping it would attract somebody like you! DavidWBrooks 21:42, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- I didn't write the text, I just merged Fake book and Fake Book (note the capital 'b') and rearranged some sentences. Stw 11:51, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Hi, see the Village pump (top) for the problem with the images. Hopefully it'll be resolved soon. - snoyes 21:22, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
I found "quefrency" and "cepstrum" in Musical Applications of Microprocessors, which I've since lost but would love to get back and build something. "Lifter" a friend told me, "gamnitude" I didn't know about until when I wrote the article, and "saphe" was written as "shape" somewhere. "saphe-cracking" LOL! -phma 23:52, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
aaargh! stop saying aaargh! we knooow there are two n's in millennium! -- Cheers Derek Ross 19:29, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I'm very impressed by your script. I did a small try for it myself, but never found out how to handle lists in a smart way. It's a proof-of concept how easy it is to go from Wikimarkup to print-ready package. (I'm also impressed by the packaging with logo, links and GFDL. The only thing missing is the URL to every article.) Cheers! ✏ Sverdrup 21:06, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Metropolis = Public Domain I've always read that Giordo Moroder made is version of Metropolis because the film was PD (while the his Soundtrack wasn't). Considering the various DVD editions of the movie I think noone care about the copyright. I don't knowwhat's the exact situation about Metropolis but a lot of things reguarding intellectual property and copyright are special reguarding Germany before 1945. Ericd 20:47, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Hi there. I've answered on my talk page. Kokiri 18:58, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new)| talk)
Unverified images
Hi. You uploaded Image:Better-tex-rendering.png but did not list any source and/or copyright information on the image description page. Please mark it either as GFDL or public domain. See Image copyright tags for more info. If the image was uploaded in error or cannot be licensed for use on Wikipedia, please add it to images for deletion. Please note that images without copyright information may be deleted in the future. Thanks. RedWolf 22:40, Dec 31, 2004 (UTC)
- Done. --stw (Talk) 17:55, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
gnuplot
"Diagram of amplitude modulation, made by myself using gnuplot"
- In the future, maybe I could ask you for help making better graphs? I don't make them much, but I made Image:Dba plot.png with maxima and gnuplot and I had to do a lot by hand afterwards... - Omegatron 19:20, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
