User talk:Sky

Please discuss with me on the individual articles' sites, and leave a message here.

I really think it's better to discuss issues on the individual article's discussion page, and there has been really weird criticism here in the past.

Thank you, Sky

Contents

1 Deutsche Wikipedia 2 Article Licensing 3 Image tagging 4 Unverified image 5 moin moin

Deutsche Wikipedia

PS: Es tut mir leid, dass Du in der deutschen Wikipedia nicht mehr dabei bist. Ich halte die Namenskonventionen für Herrscher auch nicht für besonders glücklich, und bin mit Anathema auch schon wg. Artikelnamen aneinandergeraten. Leider ist er nicht gerade sanft in seinem Diskussionsstil... ich würde Dich jedenfalls gerne wieder als Beitragenden bei der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia sehen. zeno

Das freut mich ja. Ich war schonmal irgendwo auf Deiner Benutzerseite und hab gesehen dass Du Dich nicht so um Konventionen kümmerst wenn sie Dich stören. Aber was soll ich machen bei ständigen "reverts" und Seitensperrungen durch Leute wie Anathema. Da hab ich echt keine Lust drauf. Sky 14:31, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit&section=new)| talk)

Image tagging

Thousands of images have no copyright tags. You can help sort this out by clicking on this link!

Unverified image

Thanks for uploading the image

• Image:University of Tartu main-building-winter.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Kbh3rd&action=edit) where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Thanks, Kbh3rd 01:09, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

moin moin

Gratulation zu deinen kommentaren zur deutschen wiki, seh ich genauso und wollte dir wenigstens ein paar warme worte und meinen feuchten händedruck anbieten für das gute gefühl nicht der einzige zu sein der so denkt.Lichtkind 23:09, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)