User talk:Pir
|
|
- User_talk:Pir/archive1Talk Septmber 2003-October 2004
Hello Pir, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.
Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;
If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. Angela 22:56, Sep 14, 2003 (UTC)
- I accept your explanation and I apologize for my comments. I have removed my allegation from IZAK's talk page, and Pir is welcome to remove this section from his page as well. If he chooses to do so, I will remove his comments from my talk page as well. --Viriditas 09:04, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hi Pir. You're right, I'll cool it and discuss the edits. :). But I won't stop doing significant work on that article. Cheers. --style 05:31, 2004 Oct 19 (UTC)
| Contents |
Occupation of Palestine
In case you weren't aware, HistoryBuffEr has decided to press ahead with his own unilateral version of Occupation of Palestine. Jayjg 04:47, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
PhD
Hi Pir, given the subjects on your userpage - what's the planned subject of your PhD? I keep discovering that the molecular biology side of Wikipedia is in need of serious attention... JFW | T@lk 16:15, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Thank you
Pir, thanks for your kind comments on my talk page. I want to wish you good luck on your PhD, and I hope to see you around when you are able to find the time. --Viriditas 10:13, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
HistoryBuffEr's RFC against Proteus
Hi Pir. I don't mean to distract you from your PhD work, which I hope is going well, but if you do take a little break at some point and happen to log in to Wikipedia, you might be interested in this: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Proteus. Regards, Jayjg 21:53, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion
See these six categories up for "votes of deletion":
Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Palestinian_terrorists and Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Palestinian_terrorist_organizations and Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Middle_East_terrorists and Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Terrorist_organizations and Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Islamic_terrorist_organizations and this one too: Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Jewish_terrorist_organizations
IZAK 10:10, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Opinion for IZAK
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IZAK/Evidence. Thank you. IZAK 06:54, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
well put
"The difference between troll and dissident is mainly their intention. There's no way of determining a contributor's intention with certainty." - you, on User_talk:Hephaestos
So true. It is amazing that you have to say this.
Keep up the eloquence, and the good fight against the mindless garbage. Such as Hephaestos, User:Eloquence, User:Maveric149, and other scum.
GC IV
What do you think it needs? Philip Baird Shearer 23:10, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
See Talk:Fourth Geneva Convention Philip Baird Shearer 19:22, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
A bit of history on the page for you. If you look at the talk page originally GCIV was a tool used to bash Israel. I added most of the headings so that it demphasesed the articles which the edit wars were about. I then added the sections at the begining so that people who scaned the article would realise that many people try to use it in arguments in ways which are just plane incorrect.
people use it as a bludgen in an argument without ever reading it. It is really about protecting a population which is in enemy occupied territory. It is a rather blunt insturement to beat the American administration with about their war on terrorism. So I have tried to explain those sections which I have included in Unlawful combatant mercenaries torture (Stress and duress) Laws of war etc.
Originally I snipped most of the titles in Sectioin IV but someone else inserted them. Life is too short to get into an edit war over such things.
So please read the treaty and add what you think is needed to be added and subtracted and then remove the "This article is in need of attention." or just remove it, because as it is at the moment it depreciats the aricle. Thanking you in anticipation. Philip Baird Shearer 21:27, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
U.S. embargo against Cuba
You voted for U.S. embargo against Cuba, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new)| talk)
Iraqi resistance page move
Please vote to support the move from Iraqi resistance → Iraqi insurgency at Wikipedia:Requested_moves. Thanks! ObsidianOrder 13:11, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)