User talk:Everyking

Speak up and be heard!

---

Contents

1 IRC, 2nd try 2 Everyking is too fast for a comedian like me 3 Thank you for your support 4 Theo RFA 5 Thanks again 6 Revert 7 David Helvarg 8 A suggestion 9 User:SilasSnider 10 Discussion at Talk:Pakistan 11 Thanks 12 Everyking Mentorship 13 Edit summaries 14 Thanks 15 Userpage revert 16 QE2 VfD 17 Whitelists and blacklists 18 Request for intervention 19 Benazir Bhutto 20 STALIN !!! 21 My user page 22 Nice job 23 Feces 24 Point #4 of the 4 points

IRC, 2nd try

It's 7:30 PM my time, and I should be on IRC for the next 6 hours. →Raul654 23:37, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

Everyking is too fast for a comedian like me

So I shall retire.

Thank you for your support

Hi! thank you for your support for my admin candidacy. I have now been promoted—I hope that you will always feel that I am a responsible administrator. JeremyA 05:10, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Theo RFA

Hi James: Thank you for supporting my nomination. Given your vociferous opposition to some nominations, I feel honoured to know that your support is not given lightly. --Theo (Talk) 07:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thank you for reverting the "rapeseed" vandal's insertion onto my user page. Kelly Martin 18:44, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Revert

Thanks for the speedy revert of my userpage. JeremyA 19:23, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

David Helvarg

Hi James: After your comments on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/David Helvarg I made some changes. Do you have any other improvements to propose?—Theo (Talk) 13:03, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

A suggestion

I'm willing to put aside past disagreements we've had and give this mentorship thing a try. I hope you'll extend me, Tony and Silsor the same courtesy. I do have one suggestion, though. I think it would be a show of good faith if you toned down your complaints at the admin noticeboard. You have a right to voice your opinion, but I wish you'd read up on some of these issues before you disapprove of admin conduct. I think some people get the impression that you're complaining for its own sake, and there are often very good reasons for admin blocks and Arbcom rulings.

Anyway it's just a suggestion. I think this would do a lot to show the community that you're willing to put past disagreements behind you. I realize this is outside of the scope of the mentorship, and I'm not going to push it. Rhobite 23:21, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

what song. nt goes in the topic title.

It was just a suggestion. Let's drop it. Rhobite 04:43, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

User:SilasSnider

You said 'I do read up. Point out a complaint you find excessive', on Rhobite's talk page under the heading 'User:SilasSnider'. I'm afraid I don't quite understand the remark. Would you mind clarifying? Thanks, Silas Snider (talk) 05:51, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

That was totally unrelated, don't worry about it. Rhobite 06:00, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

I thought it might have been. Thanks. Silas Snider (talk) 06:34, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Pakistan

Would you like to join the animated discussion on the Pakistan's talk page? The current issue is whether "Pakistan is famous for its support of Taliban and 9/11 terrorist" is a suitable sentence to start the article's first paragraph. Your contribution would be much appreciated, as the current discussion seems to be more of a dialog between Ragib and SamTr014 Talk:Pakistan. Thanks !--PrinceA 06:59, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the speedy revert of my userpage. --cesarb 21:14, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Everyking Mentorship

The Everyking mentorship has officially been approved by the arbitration committee (see here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Everyking_2#Subsequent_changes)) and is now in effect. →Raul654 05:51, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

To provide a central place for discussions of the mentorship, you may want to create a subpage like the one Netoholic created:

• User:Netoholic/Mentoring

If you prefer we could communicate by user talk pages, but I recommend Netoholic's method because it reduces talk page clutter and keeps communications focussed on the mentoring process. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:57, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello, James. Would you mind putting something descriptive in the Wikipedia:Edit summary field more often in article edits? Regards, Jonathunder 22:36, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! — Knowledge Seeker দ 23:10, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Userpage revert

Thanks for the revert on my user page... it's been a busy evening on RC patrol! JeremyA 02:52, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

QE2 VfD

Could someone who has not already participated in the debate please take a look at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Elizabeth II of Canada and determine whether or not there's a consensus. As far as I can determine, according to the consensus guideline at Wikipedia:Consensus the criteria has been met since there's a 2/3 majority to merge/redirect but since I've proposed the VfD in the first place it's apparently seen as objectionable by some for me to declare the now week old VfD closed and implement a redirect (the merge has already been done). AndyL 21:14, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Whitelists and blacklists

You must be using Cryptoderk's software. How else could you catch vandals that fast. 205.217.105.2 00:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Request for intervention

Hello, Marmot here. I have been threatened with blocking for the creation of Wikipedia:Administrators_cannot_vote, and noticed you had posted in defence of the article, or at least questioning the good faith of other admins. In the event I am blocked and the reason cited is of or relating to this matter, would you be willing to unblock the account?

Benazir Bhutto

R you interested in to join the discussion of cleaning up the article of Benazir Bhutto? Talk:Benazir Bhutto--Raju1 03:10, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

STALIN !!!

Why are you so fond of Stalin ??? He was a tyrant and dictator !!!! Please correct this article !!!!

My user page

Cheers for that. :) smoddy 18:09, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nice job

You got Rickyd and Russell is stupid just before I was about to {{speedy}} them. I salute you, fellow guardian of Special:Recentchanges :) jglc | t | c 19:35, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Feces

Please protect. I reformatted this silly article into some sections, but kept being reverted. mikka (t) 00:56, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Point #4 of the 4 points

"Re-elect sysops— Presently we have too many power-tripping, skull-cracking sysops. Require any sysop who is the subject of a petition with at least ten signatures to go up for re-election at the end of the year. Receiving less than a majority would mean being desysoped."

This is a great idea! The only modification I would make is "presently we have a few too many power-tripping, skull-cracking sysops - but even 'a few' are a few too many". Anybody who can't win a majority vote to retain their admin status does not deserve to be an admin. Only a small percentage of admins abuse their status, this is a good way of clearing them out. I am all behind whatever is needed to make this policy change. Ruy Lopez 02:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship, but also Wikipedia:Super-user. JRM · Talk 02:03, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)