User talk:KRS
|
|
User talk:KRS/archive1,User talk:KRS/archive2
| Contents |
hi there!
hi KRS,
we're using your photo on article hampi for our kannada Translation of the article. Thanks for such a nice photo. --Hpnadig 00:10, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new)| talk)
Image copyrights
Thanks for uploading Image:PaKua.jpg and Image:ParamaSaM(9).jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, — Edwin Stearns | Talk 18:29, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Same with Image:Ajantha1.JPG, thanks! BrokenSegue 19:08, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Indian wikipedians' notice board
Hi. I would like you to be an active member of Wikipedia:Indian wikipedians' notice board. utcursch 07:35, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
Welcome back
Hi! Seeing you back after a long time. Any plans a longer stay? Regards, =Nichalp (Talk)= 12:44, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
Ellora images
Hi! I was thinking of transferring your Ellora images to Commons. I'd like to transfer as much info as possible with them, as the images are more useable that way. At Image:Ellora7.JPG you've written Ellora- Jain cave but in the article Ellora Caves you changed the picture legend to Kailasanatha Temple. Is the Kailasanatha Temple a Jainic one, so both descriptions are correct? /Habj 16:57, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for info! /Habj 10:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- They're on Commons now, so expect to see them on many different 'pedias /Habj 21:02, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)