User talk:WojPob

20:43 Mar 5, 2003 WojPob deleted "Wikipedia:Twaddle" (nonsense, no content no history no backlinks, deleted)

Hey WojPob, what is Twaddle, anyway? -- Waveguy

Hey, WojPob -- welcome back. Since this is the English-language wikipedia, could you please find translations for your article titles? No English speaker is ever going to look up the Polish secret police agency under its Polish name -- which means that the article is fairly useless, unless youu know what the Polish name for their secret police is, which English speakers mostly wouldn't....JHK

Nice edit on Slytherin -- your English is clearly better than mine! Jinkuyeh. User:Ed Poor

---

Important note for all sysops: There is a bug in the administrative move feature that truncates the moved history and changes the edit times. Please do not use this feature until this bug is fixed. More information can be found in the talk of Brion VIBBER and maveric149. Thank you. --maveric149

---

Hi there, you have been listed as "inactive" on Wikipedia:Administrators. Please remove the notice when it is out of date. Cheers, Cyan 01:36, 9 Oct 2003 (UTC)

WojPob, good plan to make the "duplicate articles" page. Regarding the first entry there, the Crimean War - I did a major rewrite on one of them once, but I cannot promise right now to do any work on the merging. I did note that the "other" article is mostly factual information in some list form - it should therefore not be too difficult to merge the two. Jeronimo

---

Hello Wojtek, I just found the article on the Polish island of Wolin; there is another article about "Wollin peninsula" (you edited this article yourself) - maybe you know more about Polish geography: Is there really a peninsula in addition to the island called Wolin, or do both articles describe the same place? I was about to delete the "Wollin peninsula" article and merge the contents with the "Wolin" article, but I decided first to ask someone, who could know about this. Greetings, Cordyph

---

Welcome back! I haven't seen you in ages. Koyaanis Qatsi 08:01 Jan 23, 2003 (UTC)

---

I don't know if you're sympathetic to this cause, but I need support in trying to keep football at football. They want to move it to soccer, please see talk:list of footballers. Mintguy 10:12 Feb 19, 2003 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution to the debate about football. I felt outgunned and needed all the support I could muster. Thanks. Mintguy

---

Greetings...thanks for the kind welcome...quite a world inside here! Brettz9

---

Wow, quick work on kulturkampf. You beat my blank right after the article was created. ;) -- goatasaur

---

Hello WojPob, why did you blank Dobeles county, the only comment in the history is removed, but no reason is given. -- JeLuF 08:17 Apr 6, 2003 (UTC)

Poland's betrayal by the Western Allies please vote to keep it. Cautious 20:56, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Images

If you ever happen to drop by again there are a handful of images that you uploaded that are missing information as to their source. It would helpful if you could add Image copyright tags to them. If they continue to lack source information they will regrettably have to be deleted. Below is the list of such images. - SimonP 22:11, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

• Image:AirForceOne.jpg
• Image:Alfalfa im.jpg
• Image:Charlie Chaplin.jpg
• Image:Frida Kahlo.jpg
• Image:Village pump.JPG
• Image:Warsaw flag.png

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit&section=new)| talk)

Main namespace cleanup

In an effort to clean up the main namespace, I've moved your old main namespace userpage to User:WojPob/old, as there's some edit history you might want to keep. Otherwise just delete it. --fvw* 12:29, 2004 Dec 31 (UTC)