User talk:P.T. Aufrette
|
|
Beau petit jeu de mot dans ton nom... Y'en a combien qui la pogne du côté anglais d'après toi? :-) Mathieugp 20:00, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- :-) P.T. Aufrette 22:00, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
| Contents |
Constitutional debate of Canada
As-tu eu la chance de voir cette page de discussion?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Constitutional_debate_of_Canada
Il y a beaucoup de travail à faire et j'hésite encore à proposer une structure pour l'article. Cette page était directement à même Politics of Canada avant ça.
Mathieugp 18:48, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Pour l'instant j'ai beaucoup de pain sur la planche, je crée des pages sur les anciens hommes politiques québécois. Vas-y et fais des modifications comme bon te semble. J'ai ajouté cette page à mon watchlist, je vais peut-être pouvoir contribuer plus tard. P.T. Aufrette 19:46, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Do you know anything about the Quebec Liberal Party between confederation and the 1950s? That's the major gap in the Quebec Liberal Party article. Andylehrer 23:34, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- OK, I filled in some details at Quebec Liberal Party. P.T. Aufrette 03:42, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Message
Oi, remember to wikify dates, particularly years. Thanks GrazingshipIV 09:06, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Actually, I didn't create that particular page, just created a new redirect to it.
Re: the Concordia University vandal, I've added the page to my watchlist and have since reverted that user's most recent vandalism of the page. Darkcore 06:01, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
- OK, great. Obviously, I'm watching it myself, but the more people on it the better. P.T. Aufrette 18:17, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
in response to you comments on my talk page:
Hmm, well I didn't come up with the template, and I'm not very good with html. The only reason why I can see it being a bad idea would be because it would stretch out the year column rows. However, I plan on adding more years, so that might be a solution. Anyways, I'm not that good with html, and it has been very frustrating, but you may change it if you feel it necessary. Earl Andrew 19:03, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
- Since the Eastern Townships text is very verbose, I'll leave it extra small for the moment, but maybe it should change later. -- P.T. Aufrette 19:30, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
You have moved all of the Canadian election pages to "Canadian federal election, ####". A few months consensus was reached at Talk:Canadian federal election for the "#### Canadian election" format. Why do you think the grammatically awkward "Canadian federal election, ####" format is better? - SimonP 02:34, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Invitation
Salut. D'abord, en complétant la catégorie Quebec general elections (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Quebec_general_elections) que j'ai créée, j'ai remarqué combien ton travail est impressionnant sur les pages d'élections québécoises et j'amierais t'en remercier, comme pour le reste de ton travail sur la Wiki. Ensuite, je souhaite t'inviter à ajouter ton nom à la nouvelle communauté Wikipedians/Quebec et à en parler aux autres Québécois Wikipédiens (ou liés au Québec, comme les expatriés ou les Franco-Américains, par exemple) que tu connais. Merci! --Liberlogos 09:53, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new)| talk)
Federal elections charts
I’d like to get some consensus on what to do about colours in the elections charts, but I don’t want to get into a revert war, so I’m asking people to express their opinions here before any changes are made. Since you have contributed to these pages, I’m inviting your comments. I am initiating this discussion because some of the colours that are currently being used are too dark for some monitors so that it is difficult to read the text. The point of adding colours to the charts is to make it easier for readers to derive information from the charts. This goal is foiled by using colours dark enough to obscure the text. The Wikipedia style guide is clear on the issue:
- Use colour sparingly. Computers and browsers vary: you cannot know how much colour is presented on the recipient's machine if any. Wikipedia is international: colours have different meaning in different cultures. Too many colours on one page make them look cluttered and unencyclopedic. Use the colour red only for alerts and warnings.
So let’s choose some colours that are light enough that red Wilkilinked text and blue Wikilinked text are both easy to read through.
Please join the discussion at: Talk:Canadian federal election results since 1867. Thanks, Kevintoronto 17:30, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)