User talk:Kmweber
|
|
| Contents |
Indiana Wikipedians category
should probably use Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Indiana instead for the sake of consistency, unless there is a category for Wikipedians by state. Will look once I get back to editing regularly in a few days. 73, KC9CQJ 06:00, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Engr-stub
Hi - over at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Stub sorting, we've just discovered that you created a new stub type a few days ago. Normally, when new stub types are created, it is after a week's debate at the WikiProject's criteria page, so as to check that the proposed stub type isn't already covered by other stub messages and has sufficient stubs to be viable (usually 100 or so).
As it is, this stub category appears to be very similar to Template:Tl, and virtually everry article that could be given the new stub could be given this stub instead. If you could give any details of reasons for the separate stub, please list them at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Criteria#Engr-stub. Thanks! Grutness...wha? 06:45, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
National Cowper's Fluid Day
Hi, Kmweber. I found this article while I was sorting through all the biographical stubs. I can't find any mention of it outside Wikipedia. Is there another source to verify the information? Joyous 20:44, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
Category:Mojo Nixon
What is the point of this category? In either case your edits to Michael J. Fox, Joan Rivers and Elvis Presley have been reverted as nonsensical. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 15:10, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
- What's the point of it? The point of it is explained quite clearly on the category page! And those three edits are NOT nonsensical--they have to do with the Anti-Elvis, people from whom Elvis is trying to get out, and Elvis himself, as explained in Mojo Nixon's song Elvis is Everywhere Kurt Weber 15:18, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Template:Crank
Template:Crank, which you created, has been nominated for deletion at Templates for deletion. (re: Mojo Nixon: have you ever seen him perform? I used to live in San Diego and saw him several times--crazy!) BlankVerse ∅ 15:43, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Anti-Elvis
First of all, putting a {{speedy}} tag on something is not, in itself vandalism. Second, removing it from an article you created is specifically disallowed in the text the template produces. If anything, your removal was leaning toward vandal tendencies - you should disagree in the page's talk. Third, you didn't say it was from some song or other and I'm 100% certain that claiming Anti-Elvis is Michael J. Fox is about as patent as nonsense gets, so I stand by my {{speedy}} tag. Finally, if I have vandalised your page, it is not more vandalism as you claim in my talk page, since the first claim has been speedied again and not recreated so was not vandalism.
I'm not going to reinstate the nonsense tag on your page, but I'm going to ask that you go retitle the entry on my talk page out of being fair. I will be watching the page, and if I don't think the nonsense has gone will take it to VfD. -Splash 01:55, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
- From the song: Everybody's got Elvis in 'em/Everybody except for one person, that is/Yeah, one person/The evil OPPOSITE of Elvis/The Anti-Elvis!/Anti-Elvis got no Elvis in him, lemme tell ya/Michael J. Fox has no Elvis in him.Kurt Weber 04:14, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Furthermore, if you continue to use misleading edit summaries to mask your vandalism, your account will be blocked. For example [1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_J._Fox&diff=15427586&oldid=15420776), [2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joan_Rivers&diff=15519882&oldid=15420831), and [3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elvis_Presley&diff=15434492&oldid=15420921). --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 21:53, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
Woops!
Sorry, I didn't mean to revert your talk page. Thank-you for pointing it out to me. Chris Roy 23:21, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)