User talk:Bob Palin
|
Contents |
What I'm working on
Saved wiki code
right aligned thumbnail image
[[Image:JPEG|right|thumb|CAPTION]]
Table
{| border="1" cellpadding="2" !Heading col 1 !Heading col 2 !Heading col 3 |- |row 1 col 1 |row 1 col 2 |row 1 col 3 |- |row 2 col 1 |row 2 col 2 |row 2 col 3 |}
Copyright notice
{{cc-by-sa-2.0}}
Stubs and Categories
{{WikiProject Utah}} {{UT-stub}} [[Category:WikiProjects|Utah]]
Football pages
Player | Last updated | Opposition |
---|---|---|
Steve Howard | End of season 04-05 | Doncaster |
Kevin Nicholls | End of season 04-05 | Doncaster |
messages
Hi Bob. Marking something up with {{copyvio|url=whatever}} or {{imagevio|url=whatever}} adds it automatically to Category:Possible copyright violations but not to Wikipedia:Copyright problems. As the latter allows for free wiki-style discussion and can be built up in chronological order, it serves as the main list of copyright problems. I occasionally pick out any pages from the category which (like the Maradona images you found) don't seem to be listed on Copyright problems, and add them there myself - hence, with tongue slightly in cheek, "lost+found". If you could add a listing on Copyright problems when you mark an article or image as a copyvio, it would make my (self-appointed) job a bit easier. Thanks! I hope this makes sense. --rbrwr± 18:30, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
RE: Bicknell
Did you fix it?
- Okay, Bob, I made some changes. I want SLC to stay incase your flying in from....let's say Luton. I took out Canyonlands and Horseshoe. Fixed the spelling errors. I had caught "comprimise", but then got distracted, and hungry. Capital/Capitol I didn't see. You're right about the Thomas Bicknell sentence, changed that. I usually come back and look at my entries after a few days, and that sentence would have got to me too. Okay, comprOmise? WikiDon