User talk:168.243.73.3
|
|
Any changes you make to the Brain article, please incorporate them within the article - do not modify the article wholesale, which is destroying the wikilinks and the images on the page.
Also, I will be deleting Humsn brain shortly because of the typo (and it doesn't need its own article anyway).
Thank you for understanding. RadicalBender 20:16, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
If you again post the kind of personal attacks on someone's talk page that you posted on Bird's talk page, you will be blocked from editing here. Jwrosenzweig 21:09, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
I am bird, asshole. People asked me to talk, puked all over my talk page never acknowledgeing that I had replied by acknowledging the substance of my reply then locked the page so they could dominate the conversion. Notice you could not block me for even a minute, so I encourage you to do the right thing and quit meddling. IF everyone stops meddling, and returns their attention to what they can contribute, and kindly keeps to themselves their mourning that they were unable to retain User:bird, this thing might settle down. But don't count on me complying with your demands as a likely resolution. signe THE BIRD .I. as in the hand sign.
- How pleasant a response! If you are Bird, I request you log in as Bird when making such radical changes: obviously, if some random person had blanked your talk page and posted a long rant, you would be happy of my help in asking that person to cut it out. Calling me asshole really won't get us anywhere. I could, in fact, block you: this isn't a threat, but just an assurance that administrators have the ability to do such things. I'm not meddling, I'm trying to make Wikipedia a better place. If you aren't, you will be forced to leave, as I'm sure you're aware. If you're trying to make it a better place, then you and I have no quarrel. Jwrosenzweig 21:16, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- no, Mr. Rosenzweig I would not be happy for your help in the situation you describe. the fact that you phrased the statement as if you knew my preferences demonstrates that you would never be hired as a writer in a legitimate context because you don't understand basic rule of attribution and personal agency. Your missunderstanding of those rules further leads you to make blatant threats and in the next phrase, claim it is not a threat, when you declare the statement is axiomatic if not a threat.
- Your claim that you are making Wikipedia a better place is falacious. You are making it a better place for you and a good place for you is apparently one in which you can throw weight around. Unfortunately, your claim that anyone can be forced to leave is about as specious as Hussein claiming he could keep Kuwait in the face of American force. You are powerless and that is why you resort to throwing around the minor sham force you can muster. Calling you an asshole wont get you anywhere because you have no intention of going anywhere. You came here to engage in combat and you are enjoying the thrill of your day attacking other editors. ASSHOLE!
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.