User:Marco Krohn
|
|
Wikipedia news
- en:Signpost
- en:goings-on
- meta:goings-on
- meta wikipedia news
- wikimedia quarto
- Wikimedia Foundation (http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home)
"We can, do, an[d] should doubt anything we read or hear from any source whatsoever. Especially the information you get from the 6 O'Clock news.
I find Wikipedia surprisingly reliable. If i ever find something that is really off the wall, then i will be *glad*. Then i can go fix it myself - no[t] so the 6 O'Clock news - not so the textbooks for my philosophy courses." -- patty [1] (http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl1527515153d&dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=BQoYc.336344%24%25_6.23326%40attbi_s01)
My thoughts about a review process for Wikipedia:
notes
- review is much more than validation (review = syntax, spelling, ..., validation)
- is validation possible at all? see - http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Article_validation#Trust_metrics (it is thanks to NPOV)
- Vergleich mit Linux hinkt - bei Linux gibt es einen streng regulierten Zugriff auf CVS, und insbesondere keine anonymous edits
- posting auf de - user hat mehrere Artikel verändert und es wurde nicht bemerkt - http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikide-l/2004-August/019760.html
- meta:Article validation
- http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/history/results.htm
- http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000674.html
- http://www.frozennorth.org/C2011481421/E652809545/index.html
- http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/17/17817/1.html
- http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2004/07/12/one_great_source____if_you_can_trust_it/