The Tartan
|
|
The Tartan, formerly known as The Carnegie Tartan, is the original student newspaper of Carnegie Mellon University. Publishing since 1906, it is one of Carnegie Mellon's largest and oldest student organizations. It currently has over 90 student members, who contribute on a weekly basis. It is funded by advertisements and the university's student activities fee.
| Contents |
Sections
There are two sections in The Tartan. One is a standard broadsheet news section and the other is an entertainment, arts, and living tabloid section called Pillbox.
News
The News section consists of the front page and two or three other pages of timely, campus-focused content covering events, accomplishments and disappointments of the student body. The section's semi-regular features include news analysis, personality profiles, investigative reporting, and trend reporting. Its regular features include columns from the student body president and the executive officer of The Tartan, featured photographs of campus events, and a weekly dose of topical statistics.
Forum
The Forum section is where Carnegie Mellon's campus discusses current issues. It contains letters to the editor, a semi-regular column by the newspaper's ombudsman, op-ed pieces, and articles from the campus community.
Science & Technology
This section is relatively new to the newspaper. It covers the school's many achievements in the fields of robotics, computer science, biology, physics, and other fields, as well as lectures and events with a technology or science slant.
Sports
This section covers the weekly games, home and away, of Carnegie Mellon's sports teams, including intramural ones. Its features include analysis of professional sports leagues, commentaries, and a schedule of upcoming games and events.
Pillbox
Pillbox is The Tartan 's arts, living, and entertainment section. As an insert accompanying the broadsheet, it has its own comics editor in addition to a section editor. Pillbox covers the latest restaurant openings in the Oakland, Shadyside, and Squirrel Hill neighborhoods, on-campus concerts, dramatic performances, and organizations. It also contains music and movie reviews.
Comics
As a section of Pillbox, it has its own column about the comics industry, in addition to a variety of syndicated and student-drawn comics.
Staff
The staff of The Tartan comprises two major levels, the Editorial Staff and regular staff.
Editorial Staff
The Editorial Staff constitutes the core of The Tartan's contributors, making decisions about the articles, photographs, and art pieces submitted by the regular staff. The Editorial Staff is divided into editors and managers. Editors deal directly with the assigning, production, and processing of content, while managers coordinate their staffs to provide a service to the publication.
Editorial Board
The Editorial Board is a subgroup of the Editorial Staff, charged with formulating and communicating the newspaper's formal opinion every week. Each issue contains two editorials, marked "From the Editorial Board," both of which are written by Editorial Board members and vetted by the entire Board before publication. The Board is appointed by the Editor-in-Chief and approved by a majority vote of the Editorial Staff.
Regular Staff
When a student first joins the newspaper as a writer, he or she is considered a junior staffwriter. After contributing to six issues or having two published articles in each of two separate sections, the student becomes a full staffwriter. After a year of regular contribution, the staffwriter is eligible to become a senior staffwriter (a position which confers no tangible benefits, but senior staff do get their names in the masthead each week).
Recent Events
A Brief Independence: 2002–2004
In 2002, The Tartan's leadership decided to leave the student funding process of Carnegie Mellon University. Brad Grantz, Editor-in-Chief at the time, believed that the newspaper needed to be independent so its mission could grow. Breaking away was also an attempt to remove the ethical burden of reporting on the same entities that funded the newspaper. The move eventually led to an increase in the organization's debt. The Tartan rejoined the student funding process in the spring of 2004 and started what will no doubt be a long road to financial solvency.
Missing Website: 2004–Present
In the spring of 2004, a disgruntled employee removed the code for The Tartan's website from its server. A theft report was filed with Campus Police, but due to ambiguous legal restrictions, the aftermath is unable to be disclosed. Since then, The Tartan has had to rebuild its internal and external websites from scratch.
The "Natrat": April 2004
The Tartan has traditionally published an annual April Fools joke issue called the "Natrat" (Tartan spelled backwards). In the April 2004 edition, a comic (http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2004/04/13318.php) containing highly offensive racist material was published, in addition to other offensive material. The ensuing media attention and campus outcry [1] (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04095/295991.stm) [2] (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04098/297374.stm) forced the editor-in-chief and the managing editor to resign. The artist of the offending cartoon was also dismissed from the newspaper. [3] (http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04254/376625.stm) The organization ended up choosing an outsider as its new editor-in-chief, electing Mark Egerman, a campus leader who had never previously worked for the newspaper.
Ad Refusal: November 2004
In November of 2004, The Tartan's executive officer, Mark Egerman, declined to run an advertisement submitted by conservative writer David Horowitz. Horowitz has gained publicity by placing or attempting to place similar ads in a number of student newspapers across the country. Egerman chose not only to censor the advertisement, but to publish his own statement on why he made that decision in the exact same space. While a small number of university newspapers declined to run the advertisement, none took as direct an approach as The Tartan.
This action caused the The Tartan to once again gain media attention, this time drawing fire from conservatives who viewed the paper as having a liberal agenda. [4] (http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/archive/2005/January2005/CMUnewspaperrejectsadtribunereview010505.htm) [5] (http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/politics/10507192.htm) Egerman was even out by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review for criticism.[6] (http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/archive/s_287650.html) He turned around and accused the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review of violating journalistic ethics by defending Horowitz, whose chief funder Richard Mellon Scaife is the publisher of the Tribune-Review. [7] (http://thetartan.org/forum/2005/01/17/journalisticintegrityseeminglyoptional) Not only did the Tribune-Review fail to disclose any conflict of interest, but censored Egerman's letter to the editor that pointed out this problem.
An impromptu debate between Horowitz and Egerman occurred in January 2005, when Horowitz was interviewed by Carnegie Mellon's student-run radio station WRCT. Egerman called in and refused to apologize or back down from his decision.
External link
- The Tartan (http://www.thetartan.org)