Talk:TLAs from AAA to DZZ
|
|
Is this trip really necessary? —LarryGilbert 20:18, 2004 Mar 7 (UTC)
Are we going to have the 4 and 5 and 6 letter abbreviations? Joyous 04:51, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)
- The 4-letter abbr. were deleted. -- User:Docu
I suppose it could appeases someone's academic interest about how many of the possible TLAs are used. Just going by the ones that have articles, it looks like about a third are used. CyborgTosser 08:37, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Results of deletion discussion: see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/TLAs from AAA to DZZ. Voted to keep. DJ Clayworth 16:30, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Removing from these lists the "yet" from "TLAs in red or followed by a question mark do not yet have an article", because this makes it seem like there ought to be one. Tempshill 23:29, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I just discovered this page after creating a few redirects and trying what links here. Awkward. :-) --[[User:Valmi|Valmi ✒]] 05:06, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
CAT points to a disambiguation page. Should it be corrected to point to CAT? None of the other links on this page have this yet.
Umm
The purpose of this page is...? Jaberwocky6669 06:40, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)
- yeah, i totally agree. although i'm normally as inclusionist as possible, I can't figure out what the point could possibly be of a list of all the possible 3 letter combinations of the english alphabet. A list of TLAs in use is one thing, but that isn't what this is, this is just a long list that could be summed up just as easily by giving on mathematical expression with an exclamation point in it, or however you note that . . . seems to have already run the gauntlet of vfd though. --Heah 19:18, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)