Talk:Rhesus
|
|
The use of "group" and "type" on this page is inconsistent with the definitions given in [1] (http://www.mckinley.uiuc.edu/health-info/hlthpro/bloodtyp.html). IANAn expert on this. Also, there should be a link to blood type. (See also my post on Talk:blood type.) Fpahl 09:30, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Interesting -- Google turns up both "associated with" and "associated to", with a ration of roughly 12:1 -- is this a regional variation? Fpahl 12:23, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Well, I must admit English is not my first language. Weird constructs may slip into what I write from time to time. Actually, your observation is interesting. Could it be that most of the people who wrote "associated to" are non-native speakers?
- Look at these Google results:
- "associated with" site:gutenberg.org -> 108 pages
- "associated to" site:gutenberg.org -> 0 page
- The hypothesis seems to make sense. Delta G 18:31, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)