Talk:Nobel Peace Prize
|
|
Its better to list the prize-winners as a table. The way its listed now -- tabbed new line -- is taking twice the amount of space on the page. Jay 08:43, 12 Nov 2003 (UTC) it is in fact like "no" or "know". This cannot possibly be an appropriate part of the article without a reference to how to interpret it. --Jerzy 18:21, 2004 Jan 16 (UTC)
IMO, much valuable material at Peace-Prize nominations (http://www.nobel.no/eng_com_index.html) should be included, as there is considerable confusion abt this.
It should be stated conclusively that Yassir Arafat funded terror. I tried to incorporate this but it was rejected.
- Agreed. The article suggests that only people on the right-wing fringe believe that Arafat supported terror.
Where's the outrage?
On the Bank of Sweden Prize for Economics, there are two links expressing outrage at the conservative bias towards the Chicago school. Where are the link here to outrage over the undeniable liberal bias in the Nobel Peace prize? Jimmy Carter, Kofi Annan...next thing you know they'll award a terrorist like Yasser Arafat - oh wait.
1988 U.N. Peacekeepers
The official presentation speech [1] (http://nobelprize.org/peace/laureates/1988/presentation-speech.html) does not mention Canadian forces. The description in our article is not supported by evidence. I am going to remve the reference to the Canadian forces. -Willmcw 23:20, May 30, 2005 (UTC)