Talk:Measurement problem
|
|
This article is biased as hell. Less cynicism, more objectivity.
Yes, this article is disgustingly POV. I happen to agree with its POV, but still. I will work on it tonight if I get some time. Glenn Willen (Talk) [[]] 21:43, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
The reference I added some time ago should give a better overview, even if not only focussing on the measurement problem. By the way, whould this article receive an NPOV-tag?
This stinks of NPOV. Please see Talk:Measurement in quantum mechanics for a suggestion to solve both the many problems of that article, and the POViness of this one. Bth 18:58, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Revolution for the article
Dear ladies and Gentlemen,
I revised the article and the reference at the end is the only thing that was not changed because I believe that it looks OK. My guess is that you will agree that this is a much better starting point for a serious article than the previous one.
Sincerely, Lubos Motl, Harvard University --Lumidek 01:16, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Waaaay better. The general problem of this entry is, though, IMHO, that the measurement problem is often the reason and ultimately the test for every interpretation of quantum theory, so that any discussion of the measurement problem quickly becomes a discussion of interpretations of quantum theory. Maybe the discussion of any interpretation should be relocated to the interpretation page and instead the measurement problem should be spelled out in detail?