Talk:British coinage
|
|
I think that a there should be two coin sections, one for silver, copper, and modern, whose values remain fixed in pounds sterling, and one for gold coins, like the guinea, which fluxuated with the price of gold with respect to silver.
Some things that need fixing:
- The 10p coin has been around since decimalization.
- It's worth mentioning that the 1 and 2 shilling coins were carried across as the 5p and 10p, until the sizes were changed for both coins in the 1990s.
- do we really need a page for each coin? Euro coins has (superb) pictures all on one page.
- I heard that decimalization was a condition set by the EU for entry. switching to the metric system too.
- That can't be so - the currency was decimalized long before there even WAS a EU. Besides, why would they care about British currency, outside of whether it's kept or replaced by the Euro? Metric I can see - everyone else uses it, so it'd be odd to have one member without it, but there's no standardization for the non-Euro currencies Nik42 04:59, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
(comments transferred from main article)
What was the abbreviation for a farthing? Also, if 3/6 was the abbreviation for three shillings and sixpence, what was the abbreviation for three shillings, sixpence and one farthing? -- Heron
- You just wrote it out as a fraction (which I can't accurately represent here of course!) - so three shillings and sixpence was 3/6 and three shillings, sixpence and one farthing was 3/6 1/4 with the 1/4 written properly as a fraction and close up to the 6d. A farthing on its own was 1/4d, again written as a real fraction. OK? :) Nevilley 23:36 Mar 17, 2003 (UTC) PS Same goes for 1/2 and 3/4, natch.
- 3/6 ¼ - Hephaestos
- Ah! Thank you. In fact, it would have been 3/6¼ with no space. (Nitpick!) :) Nevilley 08:25 Mar 18, 2003 (UTC)
- I like the nitpicks, I tend to be a nitpicker myself. *grin* (That is, when I know the subject, or think I do.) ¼, ½ & ¾ (188, 189 & 190) have the added advantage that they're low enough order to show up even in browsers that aren't up to Unicode. Three fractions isn't many, but fortunately for farthings it's all one needs. - Hephaestos
(Comments on the £1 and £2 from 1 Feb 2003 removed, as they've all been incorporated into the One Pound and Two Pounds sub-articles). -- Arwel 01:36 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
| Value | Description | Edge inscription | Designer | Composition | Weight (grams) | Diameter (mm) | Edge thickness (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| £2 | Silver-coloured disc surrounded by a copper-coloured ring. "A symbolic representation of the development of British industry from the Iron Age to the modern Computer Age" | Standing on the shoulders of giants | Bruce Rushin | Inner circle - Cupro-Nickel (75% Copper, 25% Nickel). Outer circle - Nickel-Brass (76% Copper, 4% Nickel, 20% Zinc) | 12.00 | 28.40 | 2.50 |
| £1 | Gold-coloured disc | Decus et Tutamen (An ornament and a safeguard) | ? | Nickel-Brass (70% Copper, 5.5% Nickel, 24.5% Zinc | 9.50 | 22.50 | 3.15 |
| £0.50 | Silver-coloured Heptagon | - | Christopher Ironside | Cupro-Nickel (75% Copper, 25% Nickel) | 8.00 | 27.30 | 1.78 |
| £0.20 | Silver-coloured Heptagon | - | William Gardner | Cupro-Nickel (84% Copper, 16% Nickel) | 5.00 | 21.40 | 1.70 |
| £0.10 | Silver-coloured disc | - | Christopher Ironside | Cupro-Nickel (75% Copper, 25% Nickel) | 6.50 | 24.50 | 1.85 |
| £0.05 | Silver-coloured disc | - | Christopher Ironside | Cupro-Nickel (75% Copper, 25% Nickel) | 3.25 | 18.00 | 1.70 |
| £0.02 | Bronze-coloured disc | - | Christopher Ironside | From September 1992: Copper-plated Steel. Pre-September 1992: Bronze (97% Copper, 2.5% Zinc, 0.5% Tin). | 7.12 | 25.90 | 1.85 / 2.03 |
| £0.01 | Bronze-coloured disc | - | Christopher Ironside | From September 1992: Copper-plated Steel. Pre-September 1992: Bronze (97% Copper, 2.5% Zinc, 0.5% Tin). | 3.56 | 20.03 | 1.65 |
The florin is listed as continuing until decimalisation, but I'm sure the only ones I saw said "two shillings", not "florin". Anyone know when it changed? Bagpuss 22:19 Mar 17, 2003 (UTC)
Never thought of that before, might turn out to be hard to write up; in 1904 they were inscribed with both. - Hephaestos 22:25 Mar 17, 2003 (UTC)
Coins inscribed "florin" were still around in the 1960s, although all the ones after George V said "two shillings". -- Arwel 23:04 Mar 17, 2003 (UTC)
- Shilling (1/-), 1502-1970, in circulation until 1990, counting as 5 new pence.
or
- Shilling (1/-), 1502-1970, circulated until 1990 as the old Five Pence coin.
Sorry, Arwel, but I found your wording confusing, which is why I changed it. Maybe mine wasn't that great either. Perhaps this and the previous problem would go if we list the various values and then list the coins with that value chronologically within that. i.e.
- Coins worth 1/- or 5p
- Shilling, 1502-1970 (legal tender until 1990)
- Five New Pence (same size as the shilling), 1968-1990 (legal tender until 1990)
- Five New pence (smaller version), 1990-
Bagpuss 18:33 Mar 18, 2003 (UTC)
Yes, things are always likely to be a bit ambiguous. All the 17th century coins worth a pound are confusing too, especially when some names come back into use and the confusion of the Civil War. The way things are now it looks like you could still find a 1502 shilling in circulation in 1990! Maybe a comment should be added about how coins fell out of use with the various recoinages (especially 1816), and with changes in the metal composition, esp. 1947. First thing is to do an article about Maundy money, I think, and then continue with histories of each coin -- I'm not too bothered about the order of the coins, though descending value/date seem fairly logical. Zoe thinks some of the coin article names are a bit long, but at least they're unambiguous. By the way Hephaestos suggested putting coin inscriptions within <small></small> tags, which I think look really neat, like ELIZABETH II D G REGINA. -- Arwel 20:05 Mar 18, 2003 (UTC)
- I think we might be able to make Zoe and others a bit happier by using a scheme with the lesser-used term in parentheses, such as Half Florin (Leopard). I could be wrong though; trying to read minds again. ;) - Hephaestos
Names of the coin pages
I don't think the current names are terribly good to link to: "British coin Five Pence". I think we could simply have "Five pence", or "Five pence coin". If we need disambiguation, "Five pence coin (UK)". Any objections or suggestions before I move pages? (anyone else feel free to beat me to it! :) -- Tarquin 17:02 Mar 23, 2003 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd strongly object -- granted the current names aren't terribly elegant, but we're currently working on describing all the denominations that have ever circulated in England (I'll let someone else work on Scottish coinage, if they're interested!). In the case of the five pence, I'll grant you there was never a coin called that before 1968, but you would still want to distinguish it from the Irish five pence coin. I notice on the ten pence article you've changed the link from "British coin Florin" to plain "Florin", although that coin was worth two shillings to 1971, and we've already got an article on the "English coin Florin or Double Leopard" which was worth six shillings in 1344, and you'd need to distinguish between the florin as an alternate name for the late Dutch guilder, and various coins called florins which have been produced all over Europe since they first appeared in Renaissance Florence. There is method in our madness! -- Arwel 17:17 Mar 23, 2003 (UTC)
The problem is that these names are extremely unnatural. Do you ever say to a numismatic friend "I have an English coin ten pence here"? "Ten pence coin (UK)" so you can use the pipe trick. Or, if in the actual article text you're going to specify the country, "UK ten pence coin". These read like the names of actual things. -- Tarquin 21:37 Mar 23, 2003 (UTC)
- Well in my defence I'll just say that this format's been in use since at least 10 months before I found Wikipedia! (as I just replied to "212" who complained about it on my talk page, even though the format was in use when he edited the page :-) ). I've no great objection to renaming them as long as I don't have to do them all! ... Do however pause before you start as we need to think through how we distinguish the different time periods -- you can't describe a coin as "UK" before 1707; in the present system I've tended to describe coins before 1603 as "English", ones from after 1707 as "British" and for between 1603 and 1707 I tended to switch in between them depending on how I felt at the time. For pennies I'm not even sure about describing all of them as "English" since the first ones predate the English state... -- Arwel 01:36 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
Sorry to add woes but I don't think the recent pluralization of coin names is correct - you don't say "two pounds coin", but "two pound coin" etc. Shouldn't we reflect usage? Nevilley 23:34 Mar 23, 2003 (UTC)
- Well, you don't say "two pounds coin" but the coin itself says "two pounds". Except in the case of the £2 and £5 all the other coin names we have links to are what are actually on the coin, which is why I brought those two into line too. -- Arwel 01:36 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
- Fair enough! Maybe we could just add a note on the common usage which might be useful to non-natives. But yes, as that's what it says on the coins, I am sure you are right and it should stay there. Thanks. Nevilley 08:03 Mar 24, 2003 (UTC)
April 23 says: *1968 - The United Kingdom produces its first decimalised coins, a 5p and a 10p coin.
- Which is correct, 1971 or 1968? -- Zoe
- Both. - Hephaestos
- Yup - 5p and 10p were introduced in 1968, 50p in 1969, since they had exact equivalent values (1/-, 2/-, 10/-) in the old currency, even though actual decimalisation wasn't until 1971. Actually, of course, the first decimalised coin was produced in 1849 with the florin, it's just that they didn't proceed with the idea for another 120 years! -- Arwel
- Which is correct, 1971 or 1968? -- Zoe
Under Slang there is this reference: "a half crown was a half dollar." Is this correct? Willmcw 05:20, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- It was certainly used in some places as late as the 1950s. I don't remember hearing it used in my presence (I never had that much money in the 60s when it still circulated!), and I suspect it may have been a Londonism. 5/- was the approximate exchange rate for the US dollar in much of the early 20th century, but I don't know if that was the connection - Britain also issued "trade dollars" for use in China and the Pacific in the nineteenth century. -- Arwel 12:45, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- half a dollar was certainly widely used in both the South east (my family home) and in Solihull where I was living in the 1950s and 1960s.
Velela 23:48, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Coppers as slang. Arwel is right about the 20p limit on the use of 1p and 2p coins, however I think that copper is neverthless a slang term in use such I've only got a few coppers....
Velela 23:48, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Libra
"The symbol, £, for the pound is derived from the first letter of the Latin word for pound, the librum."
I suppose "librum" is the accusative case of liber (i.e. book).
Pound was libra (see Ancient_weights_and_measures#Weight_2