Pollard's rho algorithm
|
Pollard's rho algorithm is a special-purpose integer factorization algorithm. It was invented by John Pollard in 1975. It is particularly effective at splitting composite numbers with small factors.
Contents |
Core ideas
The rho algorithm is based on Floyd's cycle-finding algorithm and the birthday paradox. It is based on the observation that, by the birthday paradox, two numbers x and y are congruent modulo p with probability 0.5 after
- <math>1.177\sqrt{p}<math>
numbers have been randomly chosen. If p is a factor of n, the integer we are aiming to factor, then:
- <math>\gcd(|x-y|,n)=p<math>
since
- <math>x-y\equiv0\pmod{p}.<math>
The rho algorithm therefore uses a function modulo n as a generator of a pseudo-random sequence. It runs one sequence twice as "fast" as the other; i.e. for every iteration made by one copy of the sequence, the other copy makes two iterations. Let x be the current state of one sequence and y be the current state of the other. The GCD of |x − y| and n is taken at each step. If this GCD ever comes to n, then the algorithm terminates with failure, since this means x = y and therefore, by Floyd's cycle-finding algorithm, the sequence has cycled and continuing any further would only be repeating previous work.
The algorithm
Inputs: n, the integer to be factored; and f(x), a pseudo-random function modulo n
Output: a non-trivial factor of n, or failure.
- x ← 2, y ← 2; d ← 1
- While d = 1:
- x ← f(x)
- y ← f(f(y))
- d ← GCD(|x − y|, n)
- If 1 < d < n, then return d.
- If d = n, return failure.
Note that this algorithm will return failure for all prime n, but it can also fail for composite n. In that case, use a different f(x) and try again.
Richard Brent's variant
In 1980, Richard Brent published a faster variant of the rho algorithm. He used the same core ideas as Pollard, but he used a different method of cycle detection that was faster than Floyd's original algorithm.
Brent's algorithm is as follows:
Input: n, the integer to be factored; x0, such that 0 ≤ x0 ≤ n; and f(x), a pseudo-random function modulo n.
Output: a non-trivial factor of n, or failure.
- y ← x0, r ← 1, q ← 1.
- Do:
- x ← y
- For i = 1 To r:
- y ← f(y), k = 0
- Do:
- ys ← y
- For i = 1 To min(m, r − k):
- y ← f(y), q ← (q × |x − y|) mod n
- g ← GCD(q, n), k ← k + m
- Until (k ≥ r or g > 1)
- r ← 2r
- Until g > 1
- If g = n then
- Do:
- ys ← f(ys), g ← GCD(x − ys, n)
- Until g > 1
- Do:
- If g = n then return failure, else return g
In practice
The algorithm is very fast for numbers with small factors. For example, on a 733Mhz workstation, an implementation of the rho algorithm, without any optimizations, found the factor 274177 of the sixth Fermat number in about half a second. The sixth Fermat number is 18446744073709551617 (20 decimal digits). However, for a semiprime of the same size, the same workstation took around 9 seconds to find a factor of 10023859281455311421 (the product of 2 10-digit primes).
For f, we choose a polynomial with integer coefficients. The most common ones are of the form:
- <math>f(x)=x^2+c\hbox{ mod }n,\,c\neq0,-2.<math>
The rho algorithm's most remarkable success has been the factorization of the eighth Fermat number by Pollard and Brent. They used Brent's variant of the algorithm, which found a previously unknown prime factor. The complete factorization of F8 took, in total, 2 hours on a UNIVAC 1100/42.
Example factorization
Let n = 8051 and f(x) = x2 + 1 mod 8051.
i | xi | yi | GCD(|xi − yi|, 8051) |
1 | 5 | 26 | 1 |
2 | 26 | 7474 | 1 |
3 | 677 | 871 | 97 |
97 is a non-trivial factor of 8051. Other values of c may give the cofactor (83) of 97 instead of 97.de:Pollard-Rho-Methode pl:Rho Pollarda