Axis of evil
|
|
The term axis of evil was used by United States President George W. Bush in his State of the Union Address on January 29, 2002 to describe "regimes that sponsor terror". The states Bush originally gave in his speech were Iraq, Iran, North Korea and then later Syria, but the definition could be interpreted broadly to include other governments.
His words have been interpreted by some to mean that the "axis of evil" consists solely of those three countries. Some argue that this is a misinterpretation. However, singling out the three in such a forum as a State of the Union address, and the mention of three countries and no others as an "axis", in light of the historical analogy of the German-Italian-Japanese Axis, is likely to result in such an interpretation.
| Contents |
The phrase
The phrase is derived from that of the rogue state, but the term itself is reminiscent of the Axis powers of World War II and of President Reagan's evil empire designation of the Soviet Union.
Bush's exact statement was as follows:
- [Our goal] is to prevent regimes that sponsor terror from threatening America or our friends and allies with weapons of mass destruction. Some of these regimes have been pretty quiet since September the 11th. But we know their true nature. North Korea is a regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction, while starving its citizens.
- Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people's hope for freedom.
- Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror. The Iraqi regime has plotted to develop anthrax, and nerve gas, and nuclear weapons for over a decade. This is a regime that has already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens -- leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children. This is a regime that agreed to international inspections -- then kicked out the inspectors. This is a regime that has something to hide from the civilized world.
- States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred. They could attack our allies or attempt to blackmail the United States. In any of these cases, the price of indifference would be catastrophic.
Although the United States' methods for dealing with Iraq markedly differed to those used with North Korea, this is probably due to the fact that whereas Iraq was only suspected of having weapons of mass destruction, North Korea openly flaunted its long-range ballistic missile capabilities. In addition, some right-wing political strategists (the neoconservatives, led by Richard Perle) favored by the Bush Administration have recently demanded military strikes in North Korea against its nuclear sites. (Daily Telegraph article (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F12%2F31%2Fwcons31.xml)) It should also be noted that the Clinton Administration considered removal of spend fuel rods from North Korea's primary nuclear reactor to be provocation for air strikes. As of June 06, 2005 these fuel rods have been removed and no airstrikes have occured.
The inclusion of North Korea among the trinity might have been a way for the US to distance itself from the perception that the "war on terror" is a "war against Islam".
Shortly after its utterance, the phrase was attributed to former Bush speechwriter David Frum, originally as the "axis of hatred" and then "evil".
It might be assumed that since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the phrase "Axis of Evil" would only apply to North Korea and Iran.
Origins of the phrase
Former Bush speechwriter David Frum explained his rationale for creating the phrase "axis of evil" in his book The Right Man: The Surprise Presidency of George W. Bush. Essentially, the story begins in late December 2001 when head speechwriter Mike Gerson gave Frum the assignment of articulating the case for dislodging the government of Saddam Hussein in Iraq in only a few sentences for the upcoming State of the Union address. Frum says he began by rereading President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "date that will live in infamy" speech given on December 8, 1941, after the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. While Americans needed no convincing about going to war with Japan, Roosevelt saw the greater threat to the United States coming from Germany, and he had to make the case for fighting a two-ocean war.
Frum points to a now often-overlooked sentence in Roosevelt's speech which reads in part, "...we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost but will make very certain that this form of treachery shall never endanger us again." Frum interprets Roosevelt's oratory like this: "For FDR, Pearl Harbor was not only an attack—it was a warning of future and worse attacks from another, even more dangerous enemy." Japan, a country with one-tenth of America's industrial capacity, a dependence on imports for all its food, and already engaged in a war with China, was extremely reckless to attack the United States, a recklessness "that made the Axis such a menace to world peace", Frum says. Saddam Hussein's two wars against Iran and Kuwait were just as reckless, Frum believed, and therefore presented the same threat to world peace.
The more he compared the Axis powers of World War II to modern "terror states", the more similarities he saw. "The Axis powers disliked and distrusted one another", Frum writes. "Had the Axis somehow won the war, its members would quickly have turned on one another." Iran, Iraq, al-Qaeda, and Hezbollah, despite quarrelling among themselves however, "all resented power of the West, and they all despised the humane values of democracy." There, Frum saw the connection: "Together, the terror states and the terror organizations formed an axis of hatred against the United States."
Frum sent off a memo with the above arguments and also cited some of the atrocities perpetrated by the Iraqi government. He expected his words to be chopped apart and altered beyond recognition, as is the fate of much presidential speechwriting, but his words were ultimately read by Bush nearly verbatim. His term "axis of hatred" had been changed to "axis of evil" to match the theological language used by Bush since September 11, 2001. North Korea was added to the list, he says, because it was attempting to develop nuclear weapons, had a history of reckless aggression, and "needed to feel a stronger hand".
"Beyond the Axis of Evil"
On May 6, 2002 United States Under Secretary of State John R. Bolton gave a speech entitled "Beyond the Axis of Evil". In it he added three more nations to be grouped with the already mentioned "rogue states": Libya, Syria, and Cuba. The criteria for membership of this group was: "state sponsors of terrorism that are pursuing or who have the potential to pursue weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or have the capability to do so in violation of their treaty obligations". The speech was widely reported as an expansion of the original Axis of Evil. The allegation of Cuban WMD capability was particularly strenuously denied by the Cuban government, and disputed by former president Jimmy Carter who visited the country a week later after being briefed by US officials.
In January 2005, at the beginning of Bush's second term as President, the incoming Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, made a speech regarding the newly termed "Outposts of tyranny", a list of six countries deemed most dangerous and anti-American. This included the two remaining "Axis" members, as well as Cuba, Belarus, Zimbabwe and Myanmar.
Criticism of the term
There have been a number of criticisms of the term.
One of them is that unlike the Axis powers, the three nations mentioned in Bush's speech have not been coordinating public policy, and therefore the term axis is incorrect. Indeed, Iran and Iraq fought the long, bloody Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, under basically the same leadership as that which existed at the time of Bush's speech. Additionally, it is argued that each of the three have some special characteristics which are obscured by grouping them together.
Most controversial was inclusion of Iran into the "axis of evil", because Iran is seen by many as in the process of secularization, and it is speculated that the US terming it evil will give more influence to the radical Islamists in that country. However the majority of Iran's oil wealth and military might is controlled by a very small minority of devoted Islamists who continue to sponsor terrorism, both publicly and through clandestine channels, that targets the United States, it's Allies and democracy in the greater Middle East.
After Bush defined which nations he considered to be in the "axis of evil", several opponents of America created their own version of the "axis of evil". Many critics in Muslim nations defined their "axis of evil" as being composed of United States, Israel and Britain.
Some have criticized (perhaps in jest) the phrase on technical grounds, as a potential misunderstanding of the original World War II usage. Shortly after Hitler's Germany and Mussolini's Italy allied in the 1930's, Hitler promoted the occasion by publicly saying "The world should revolve on a Rome-Berlin Axis". It was some time after this statement was made that Japan allied with Germany, which according to some, rendered the entire "revolve around an axis" theme unfeasible, because three points define a plane, while an axis is a line.
Others believe the term refers to a single axis of many powers, which together act as an "axis" around which the world will be made to revolve. In that sense, the original usage, as well as Bush's usage, are metaphorically permissible.
Also, some people consider it inappropriate to envoke images of World War II in order to gain support for the War on Terror.
Other uses
By analogy to "axis of evil", the term "axis of the willing" has occasionally been applied to the "coalition of the willing" (for countries that participated in the 2003 invasion of Iraq).
The term has also lent itself to various parodies, including "axis of weasels" (mocking certain countries that did not support USA on Iraq issue), "Axis of Eve" (a political action group that opposes Bush), "axis of medieval" (mockingly criticizes the influence that Bush's personal Christian faith has on his political views), "asses of evil" (a mocking insult against George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld), "axles of evil" (denouncing sport utility vehicles for their poor fuel efficiency), and several other variations. Andrew Marlatt wrote an extensive parody for SatireWire, with the rule: "An axis can't have more than three countries".
See also
External links
- 2002 State of the Union Address (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html) - President George W. Bush - January 29, 2002
- "AXIS OF EVIL" (http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/international/jan-june02/axis_1-30.html) - PBS Online NewsHour - January 30, 2002
- "US expands 'axis of evil'" (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1971852.stm) - BBC News - Monday, 6 May, 2002, 22:40 GMT 23:40 UK
- "How to defeat the Axis of Evil" (http://www.salon.com/news/col/scheer/2002/10/24/axis/) - Salon.com - Oct. 24, 2002
- "Is the Axis of Evil Synchronizing its Asymmetric Offensive?" (http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/0225A_Maxwell.html) - The Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development - December 20, 2002
- "Libya’s fatal blow to axis of evil" (http://www.sundayherald.com/38834) - Sunday Herald Online - 21 December 2003
- Angered by Snubbing, Libya, China, Syria Form Axis of Just as Evil (http://www.satirewire.com/news/jan02/axis.shtml) -- a parody by Andrew Marlattde:Achse des Bösen
es:Eje del mal fr:Axe du Mal ko:악의 축 nl:As van het kwaad ja:悪の枢軸発言 fi:Pahan akseli sv:Ondskans axelmakter zh:邪恶轴心