Academic Kids:Votes for deletion/Silky's
|
|
Nonnotable, ad. google (http://www.google.com/search?q=silky's%20hentai%20game) searches (http://www.google.com/search?q=%E6%84%9B%E5%A7%89%E5%A6%B9%EF%BD%9E%E4%BA%8C%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%AE%E6%9E%9C%E5%AE%9F%EF%BD%9E) did not (http://www.google.com/search?q=%EF%BD%9E%E9%B3%A5%E9%81%94%E3%81%AE%E7%BE%BD%E3%81%B0%E3%81%9F%E3%81%8D%EF%BD%9E) return many results. —siroχo
- Delete. At best it goes in hentai, though my personal preference is /dev/null. --Ardonik 05:08, Jul 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Don't delete for lewdness, but delete because it's only known to Japanese people (87 sites link to it and they're all Japanese). Possibly candidate for a Japanese Wikipedia article. Derrick Coetzee 07:24, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: It's non-notable of specialist interest, and unlikely to be sought. Geogre 13:18, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. SWAdair | Talk 04:36, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: Lots of not overly notable specialist pages are in the Wiki, how is this any different? Especially corporate pages. [1] (http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=%22immoral+sisters%22+dvd&btnG=Search&meta=), [2] (http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=%22immoral+sisters%22+hentai&btnG=Search&meta=), seem to have several Google links (in English), even though [3] (http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=aishimai&btnG=Search&meta=) has limited searches. As for it being deleted simply because it is hentai, that would mean that the Wikipedia will be forever incomplete, and highly skewed toward the ethnocentric bias of the most active editors, if we all just chose to edit for content deemed immoral by a group. Although I seem to be vastly outvoted here. It's the company that makes source material for many OAV that are distributed in North America, even if the original games are not. (Lessee if I did that signature thing right)
132.205.15.4 23:55, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. While I personally couldn't care less about hentai games, I disagree with the notion of excluding articles about non-mainstream subjects. Article text is NPOV, and the list of titles the company has produced is high enough to make the company notable. It's also listed on list of H authors. Until list of H games includes the author and publisher, I see no reason to outlaw stubby lists of H games by company... which is exactly what this article is. --Benc 02:25, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)