User talk:Renata

Hi Renata, welcome back to Wikipedia! <KF> 21:24, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Nice to see you back G-Man 18:48, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Renata. Thanks for the kind message. I am still wrestling with the question of how much of this to do - if any at all - how to fit it in with other stuff, etc. I feel as if I could write a book on this topic, on what I think about the Wiki, the interactions with other users etc etc etc. The thing about "not taking it so seriously" rang very loud bells with me too. Since the last period when I did pay wikipedia a bit more attention I've got very busy looking after a website, and doing other stuff, and at times I think I just can't fit w. in at all. But it does have some highly addictive properties! I will just have to see how things develop. I hope that all is well with you and that you are enjoying being back here. Very best wishes, Neville (Nevilley 09:01, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC))

Contents

1 Image:Assisi square.jpg 2 Heworth 3 Article Licensing 4 More old images

Image:Assisi square.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Assisi square.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell ^{(talk) (help)}[[]] 23:23, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. Image:Assisi whale.jpg also. Thanks!

→ And Image:Pressed Flower Sampler.jpg

(Also Image:Kitten in Canvas Work.jpg, if you get a chance. Thanks! grendel|khan 23:06, 2004 Dec 19 (UTC))

Also Image:2StainedGlassBanners.jpg --Tagishsimon (talk)

Heworth

Hi, I don't suppose you recall where you got some of the info from for Heworth, York? See Talk:Heworth, York...thanks! — Matt 22:42, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started the Free the Rambot Articles Project which has the goals of getting users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to...

1. ...all U.S. state, county, and city articles...
2. ...all articles...

using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) version 1.0 and 2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to the GFDL (which every contribution made to Wikipedia is licensed under), but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles (See the Multi-licensing Guide for more information). Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. So far over 90% of people who have responded have done this.

Nutshell: Wikipedia articles can be shared with any other GFDL project but open/free projects using the incompatible Creative Commons Licenses (e.g. WikiTravel) can't use our stuff and we can't use theirs. It is important to us that other free projects can use our stuff. So we use their licenses too.

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) into their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}}. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know at my talk page what you think. It's important to know, even if you choose to do anything so I don't keep asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit&section=new)| talk) 14:37, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

More old images

In case you still check in here, Image:Britannia2.jpg needs info on source and copyright status, thanks. -- Infrogmation 18:54, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)