Talk:Synchronous optical networking
|
|
The statement "For example, four OC-3 or STM-1 circuits can be agregated to form a 622 Mbit/s circuit designated as OC-12 or STM-4." is a bit misleading. Actually an OC-12 is not an encapsulation of 4 OC-3s as is implied. An OC-12 contains 12 STS-1s (OC-1 at optical level) and as such can carry 4 OC-3s, however each STS-1 is carried without any type of "wrapper" within the OC-12. I'm probably being overly picky but hey, you might as well make it as clear as possible.
P.S. aGGregated has 2 "g"s ;-)
"The current state of the art is the OC-192 or STM-64 circuit, which operates at rate of just under 10 Gbit/s." The current state of the art is actually OC-768.
"It is defined by GR-253-CORE from Telcordia." Isnīt it defined by ITU-Tīs G707?
- The "agregated" is still there... why didn't you fix it? Fixed. Mga 03:05, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
10 Gigabit Ethernet and OC-192/STM-64
This article used to say they were compatible, but now it doesn't. Could somebody knowledgeable elaborate? - mako 06:29, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)