Talk:National Museum of Iraq
|
|
It was my understanding that initial reports of the artifacts' destruction were way overblown, that very few items of value were actually lost. Worth following up and possibly correcting on this point?
- It was corrected. If you read the follow-up reports carefully, they do not say that very few items were lost, just an unknown number that was considerably less than the full extent of the collection. Some U.S. media sources liked to imply that very few were lost and that initial reports were entirely off base, but that implication is just that.--The Cunctator
- Many priceless objects are still missing as of September 2003. And PBS has reported that tens of thousands of artifacts were plundered from the archaeological sites around the country and hauled off across the border to Syria or Saudi Arabia. If you imagine someone destroying a "very few items of value" to us Americans -- the Statue of Liberty, the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, Lincoln's head at the Lincoln Memorial, the Liberty Bell, Jamestown, the Alamo, Gettysburg, the White House, the Smithsonian, and setting fire to the Library of Congress, all in one day -- I think what happened in Iraq was much, much worse.
The page would be much more interesting and informative if it contained much more on the contents of the museum. By reading the article, all that one can glean is that it contained Nimrud artifacts. Other than that by-the-by mention, there's no mention of what all the museum contained. I, personally, know of some of the exhibits, but in order for an uninformed person to appreciate the tragedy of the looting, you have to understand what was looted. And that is certainly missing from the article. --patton1138 17:23, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Most of the stolen items are unaccounted for, but some private collectors in the Middle East and Europe have admitted possessing objects bearing the initials IM [1] (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4461755.stm)