Talk:Lilo & Stitch
|
|
I really, really, really think this is copyrighted material. -- Zoe
Thinly reworded of [http://starbulletin.com/2002/06/23/features/story4.html].
- I added that link as an external reference. With that, plus the rewording, I suspect we're ok. However, I'll try checking with the copyright owners to see if they want to raise an objection. Martin
I edited the page to remove the "Dean DuBlois said that ..." stuff -- it would be nice to have attributed quotes, but since the stuff they said is fairly generic and not direct quotes, I don't see a need to attribute it. I also removed some things which to me sounded questionable or didn't make much sense. I believe the article now is not just a copy of the copyrighted page linked above. Brian Kendig 05:07, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Some of the items listed as evidence of a Phantom Menace influence (like a Galactic Federation and hyperspace) long predate 1999 (and 1977 for that matter). George Lucas didn't invent science fiction. MK 06:21, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Yes, I fully agree. On the other hand Wikipedia does not have enough good articles on science fiction to make links to support these things and dropping names like Damon Knight, Poul Anderson and Harry Harrison is not enough. I was planning to start to "balance" that section by adding another one on parallels with Star Trek and then graduate to more classic written things, but it fell by the wayside. What were you thinking of doing? AlainV 22:43, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Ummm, writing that last note? Seriously, while I know enough science fiction history to recognize some errors in the article, I don't know enough to post the correct facts. I'd be more likely to just substitute my errors for the existing ones. I figured I'd call attention to the problem and hope someone better informed on the subject would come along and make the revisions. MK 03:56, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)