Talk:Likud
|
|
Likud was initially described in US as a coalition of parties rather than a party. Is that
- a mistake,
- something that needs to be mentioned here with how and when it changed, or
- still true? --Jerzy
The Likud began as a merging of the Herut party and other Israeli opposition parties. That apparantly is already present.(12/1/03) -Leumi
Text Removed for Clarification
(I've probably made some misinterpretations in my copyedit of the material i didn't move here; originating editor, please critique.)
The clause
- and the party's center passed a rule in the Likud's center rejecting to Palestinian state.
adds nothing to the article because it is incomprehensible, and i have moved it here in hopes it can be worked on. Perhaps clarifying
- what party (Likud, no? But if so, why is Likud mentioned explicitly later in the clause?),
- what is meant by "center", and
- whether a "rule" is a regulation, a policy statement, an interpretation (i.e., a "ruling"), or something else
would help some editor who is a native speaker of English turn it into something usable.
I also moved the phrase
- is a neo-Tachterist and extreme capitalist
here. "Extreme capitalist" is vaguer than the opinions reported in the next sentence. Those to whom "neo-Tachterist" has any meaning must be rare, as no reference appears in a Google search; if it's important to the point of the editor who introduced it here, we need more info on it.
And the term
- welfare services
is not clear (in context of unemployment benefits); are these government or private funds and/or agencies?
(I have made no effort to ensure NPoV, seeing the copyedit as more pressing.) --Jerzy 05:17, 2003 Dec 1 (UTC)