User talk:Zeimusu
|
|
| Contents |
Images
Various talk about images is now archived at User talk:Zeimusu/images. Please don't add new messages to that archive. Add them to this page. — Zeimusu | Talk
Older talk
Older talk is now archived at User talk:Zeimusu/chronicles
Moth list
Hi. I've just noticed your comment on Talk:Moth about the list of moth species getting too long. I completely agree with you even though this is almost entirely my fault! I've been considering doing this for a while but I'm not sure how best to format it. The list does have the potential to be frighteningly vast so I guess it's best to do something sooner rather than later! Perhaps you could tell me your thoughts. Could you drop them on my talk page thanks.
Also I noticed your comment further up about not using non-commercial only images in Wikipedia. I think I may have added a couple of these in these articles: Ghost Moth and Common Swift (moth). Do these need to go? Sorry, I wasn't aware of this policy. Richard Barlow 13:09, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
PUI
Thanks for giving me a hand on this. A key part of it is notifying the uploader that their image has been listed. This can be done with {{subst:idw-pui|IMAGENAME}}. If you are unclear about anything, there are instructions on the top of the PUI page. Cheers. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 13:41, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
Jack Corley
Thanks for the deletion warning. I can't verify the source, let alone the "freeness" of the image. So away it goes, I guess. -- Uncle Ed (talk) 16:46, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
Image Copyrights
Oh how I hate those Secret Police that sneak up and catch you on copyright issues! *cries* We Internet Pirates are just trying to illustrate the articles to provide some visual play for the mind as it reads...but then you ruin everything asking for proof of copyright waivers! =Þ (Just kidding around) Anyways, for the OperationMegaphone.jpg picture, I kinda assume it's public domain released by the DND, since it appeared in all Canadian newspapers regardless of parent companies...but other than that, I couldn't really speak either way on the issue. Sherurcij 08:50, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
Double-tagging
Please do not double tag images where a derivation is made unless you are sure that you know what license the deriver is using (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:NRZcode.png&diff=12371677&oldid=11087998). This makes things terribly unclear now, since if uploading with an alternate license effectively renders the work dual-licensed, it is difficult to know what license the person making the derivation is using, the alternate license, or the GFDL. Dysprosia 10:20, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
GFDL
Mind explaining how GFDL applies to my picture? --Kitch 17:26, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Pakistan
Would you like to join the animated discussion on the Pakistan's talk page? The current issue is whether "Pakistan is famous for its support of Taliban and 9/11 terrorist" is a suitable sentence to start the article's first paragraph. Your contribution would be much appreciated, as the current discussion seems to be more of a dialog between User:Ragib and User:SamTr014 Talk:Pakistan Thanks!--Raju1 07:32, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Images
Coyright status
- Image:BA 747 Benyhone Tartan.JPG Chris Sheldon via www.airliners.net
- Image:BA 747s ethnic tailfins.JPG Søren Geertsen via www.airliners.net
- Image:BA Rendezvous tail.jpg AirQ via www.airliners.net
- Image:BA-Qantas 747 Wings livery.jpg SamChui via www.SamChuiPhotos.com
All used with permission, I understand that these are no longer acceptable and will be deleted. Mark 19:13, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Votes for Deletion/Military Families Against the War
I have just rewritten the page Military Families Against the War. I would be grateful if you would reconsider your delete vote. Kel-nage 20:07, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)