User talk:Blankfaze

The 5 Simple Rules of Blankfaze's Talk Page:

• Click Edit this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Blankfaze&action=edit) and add whatever you have to say to the bottom.
• I ask (for the sake of organisation) that you separate it from the last person's comments by a ==level 2 heading==.
• Vandalism, trolling, and/or idiocy are reverted on sight.
• No horizontal rules (----) allowed! Ever!
• Don't be a Cooch McGooch, sign your posts (~~~~)!
  
  

Contents

1 Spelling 2 Template:Itn 3 COTW! 4 Collaboration of the week 5 Minor edit flag 6 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Eequor (2nd) 7 Escude

Spelling

Can you explain your edit [1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3ADid_you_know&diff=14688133&oldid=14675711)? It looks to me as though you haven't read or haven't understood Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. Gdr 13:46, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)

• Didn't you and I just go through all this a few weeks ago? [[User:Blankfaze|]] 00:45, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Template:Idw Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:40, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Template:Itn

[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:In_the_news&curid=482256&diff=0&oldid=0). I love it. smoddy 17:35, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

COTW!

Would you possibly take the time to vote on my entry at Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week? It's "The Seventies," near the bottom of the page. Mike H 16:38, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

Collaboration of the week

I'm dropping you a note to let you know that The Seventies, which you voted on, became a Collaboration of the Week! You are highly encouraged to contribute whatever you can to the topic! Mike H 01:24, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Minor edit flag

Hi, I see you flagged your changes to WP:AN/3RR as a minor edit. Use of this flag for that edit was inappropriate. Help:Minor edit gives guidelines on when it's appropriate to use that flag; please follow them. And before you say that in your opinion, your change was minor, please note that that page says:

consider the opinions of other editors when choosing this option

so whether you think they are minor is less important than what other editors think. Noel (talk) 16:10, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

User:Jnc/ReplyMyTalk

• Yeah, I know, it was an accident - that is, the minor edit check box is right above the save page button... I have done this a few times. Sorry. [[User:Blankfaze|]] 20:03, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • No problem; thanks! Noel (talk) 18:19, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Eequor (2nd)

Unequivocal oppose? *blink* Okay, but I have no insight as to why. I keep looking through her edits each time, and each time she comes away looking pretty good.

Even so, if I'm missing something, I really want to know. Could you tell me why you made such a strong oppose vote?

Kim Bruning 22:19, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• [3] (http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=MediaWiki_1.3_comments_and_bug_reports/Archive&diff=55137&oldid=55136) [4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Eequor&diff=6174589&oldid=6174566) not to mention many instances of POV warring, disrupting Wikipedia to make points, continued insistance of a cabal, general erratic behaviour, and on and on.

I'll be the first to admit she has gotten better with time; but, in my book, she's still a pretty terrible candidate. [[User:Blankfaze|]] 22:42, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Escude

Don't take offense, but did you read the article at escude before you rejected it for speedy delete? I realize that vanity alone does not merit speedy delete, but this page didn't even have a name for the person, just a online game account name and an assertion that he "pretty much owned the whole game". I would have listed the reason as "total crap page", but I didn't think that really fit with wikipedia standards. I vfd'd it, so it should work itself out anyway.Atomiktoaster 01:45, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Yes, I read it, yes it sucks, yes I wish I could have speedy-deleted it. Rules are rules, though, eh. [[User:Blankfaze|]] 01:48, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)