User talk:Bcrowell

---

JOACHIM GOTTSCHALK

• Reference and filmography added 6-7-05.
• German Copyright Law -- Article 72

      (1) Photographs and products manufactured in a similar way to photographs shall be protected, mutatis mutandis, by the provisions of Part I applicable to photographic works.

      (2) The right afforded by paragraph (1) shall belong to the photographer.

       (3) The right afforded by paragraph (1) shall expire 50 years after publication of the photograph, or if its first permitted public communication took place earlier, after the latter, but 50 years after its manufacture where the photograph has not been published or legally communicated in public within such period. The period shall be calculated in accordance with Article 69.

The photograph of Gottschalk was an "autogramme" postcard, signed by Gottschalk and given to a fan. He died in 1941. Therefore, the photograph was published more than 50 years ago.

Contents

1 Have you seen 2 Nice NPOV on Farnham's Freehold. 3 Broken rendering in Firefox? 4 The Sunken Road at Waterloo 5 Bryce Harrington Article 6 Copyrights 7 HSA and apartheid

Have you seen

Wikibooks? -- Baylink 21:55, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Nice NPOV on Farnham's Freehold.

Quality NPOV job on Farnham's Freehold. Couldn't have said it better myself. Keep up the good work. grendel|khan 02:22, 2005 Apr 21 (UTC)

Broken rendering in Firefox?

Hi, just wondering a little about the case of the slide rule img rendering in Firefox: can't Ff cope with plain right/left img justifications? In that case, there's a lot of WKP articles that it'll misrender. Too bad, really. --Wernher 04:40, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

(please just reply here on this page -- it's almost always better to keep a conversational thread in one place, don't you agree? --w)

Hi -- I don't think it's a general problem with Firefox rendering right/left-justified images. The examples on the wikipedia help page all look fine. It may not even be a problem with Firefox at all -- it may just be that my own screen is relatively narrow, so there's no room to fit everything.--Bcrowell 04:56, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Sunken Road at Waterloo

Yes please. Particularly as that next to the sandpit where the 95th Regiment of Foot, one of the more famous regiments of that time were stationed. Philip Baird Shearer 12:21, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Bryce Harrington Article

This article is so terse, IT'S BEING CONSIDERED FOR DELETION. Almost at the end of the vote cycle. You need to wade in and defend it. It was Posted Monday to Vfd. 02:42, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• No Problem - It burns me rear that a singer with one hit wonder is more notable than a fellow engineer. I wrote you before I read the other votes and comments, so noted yours after seeing the article which lead me to contact you on it next — before I voted. I try to make up my own mind, and I'm in a mindless mood tonight, which is why I'm voting at all! Don't have the energy to write! [[User:Fabartus| User:fabartus || TalktoMe]] 03:52, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I am wondering if you are aware that User:Norm is suspected of being the vandal Willy on Wheels? func(talk) 17:11, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Copyrights

I saw your post on FAC regarding copyrights. I've made a template Template:Tl for expired Indian copyrights (60 yrs ie. 10-10-1945). The exact text is available here: http://www.naukri.com/lls/copyright/section5.htm. I'm not a legal expert so I'm confused between "first published" and "taken on".  =Nichalp (Talk)= 08:34, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Hi Nichalp -- I don't quite understand your question. I can't find anything in the text of the law about "taken on."--Bcrowell 14:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

So how would I know when a photo was first published? It may be taken in 1930 and published in 1940. And what does "first published" mean? First published in a magazine/ newspaper like that? =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:47, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it sounds like you'd have to know when it was first published in a magazine or newspaper.--Bcrowell 14:21, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

 :( =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:02, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) Thanks for clarifying.

HSA and apartheid

Hey there, thanks for getting back to me. Of course, moving some content off the HSA article and into the apartheid one is fine! Looking forward to seeing the results. Páll 20:18, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)