Talk:The Apprentice
|
|
Can someone who's been watching add summaries of the most recent two episodes to this article? I saw most of tonight's episode but haven't been watching the show so don't feel qualified to summarize. Thanks. Moncrief 06:36, Mar 26, 2004 (UTC)
- I have added a summary for week 11. The earlier weeks' summaries (esp. 5 to 10) also need work. I will try to get to them, but anybody should feel free to jump in. There are lengthy episode recaps and a succinct weekly tracker on the official site which should be helpful. Brooklyn Nellie (Nricardo) 07:58, Mar 26, 2004 (UTC)
Episode Count
Last week's episode was just a recap and will not be counted in the episode count, which will include only episodes where candidates were eliminated.
Brooklyn Nellie (Nricardo) 07:32, Mar 26, 2004 (UTC)
Apprentice 2
Will it get its own page or be incorporated here? If here, perhaps we should being inserting "Season 1" labels. Any thoughts? Brooklyn Nellie (Nricardo) 02:15, Apr 1, 2004 (UTC) (forgot to sign when 1st posted)
- I think it should be incorporated into this article. - MattTM 07:32, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Actually, I rescind my initial decision. The current season 1 information should be split off into a separate article, and the new season 2 information should be on a separate page as well. Then they can be linked to from a seasons section in this article. This one is getting too long. - MattTM 18:29, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)
Disaprove of incorrect revert
I protest about the following revert 17:46, 4 Apr 2005 Violetriga m (rv. - no evidence of it being aimed for under 30s) in the UK section. First it is an overbearing revert. No evidence? The show is the evidence. No one could seriously think that this material, with its constant swearing and mindless style, could be aimed at anyone over 18. (I said 30 to err on the overfair side.) Second no attempt was made to justify a revert/delete beforehand. Third, to mark the change as a minor edit is clearly not on. The revert was of a significant point, not of a grammer mistake. Fourth the stubborn change by the same editor of fall to autumn, is not really on. The article is on US based subject, there's no reason at all to change to UK usage.
Such unilateral behaviour is why I started the following page, against a user who causes waste of time and trouble for other editors, with her "what I say goes " attitude. [RfC (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Violetriga)]. Please support that page if you agree with me.Kreen