Talk:Population inversion
|
|
Perhaps I should have placed all this under laser science, with a pointer at population inversion. You really need to describe it all at once to get the concept across.
Let me know if people find it too impenetrable and/or dumbed-down.
-- DrBob
Very good work. You are also right that population inversion "is a necessary step in the workings of a laser", and that the it could be placed under laser science. And perhaps it is actually better to have a long article explaining all you need to know about lasers. But just keep writing—we can alway reorganize it afterwards. --css
Ok, it's now pretty clear most of this should go in laser science. I'll do so after clarifiying a few more points.
- Wrong, it is not. See my writings at laser and Talk:Laser. lysdexia 22:09, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I have removed the disputed tag, since no justification was given. If you wish to reinstate it, please specify which facts you think are inaccurate, here. -- DrBob 22:33, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)