Talk:Marijuana
|
|
Is this page necessary, or should it be a redirect to cannabis? It seems redundant. --User:kwertii
We'll need info on why many countries ban marijuana but not alcohol or tobacco.
- http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~verdant/Marijuana_FAQ/X0020_1_How_and_why_was_he.html is not too NPOV, but it contains a lot of useful assertions that can be verified or falsified.--branko
I would like to merge this page with cannabis since currently much imformation is duplicated. The article will sit at cannabis and we'll have a redirect from marijuana to cannabis. Does that sound like a good idea? AxelBoldt 10:16 Aug 21, 2002 (PDT)
- Done.
Marijuana refers to both plant cannabis sativa and drug cannabis (drug. Please leave the redirection as it. If you have an issue with this direct it to either Talk:marijuana or Talk:Cannabis. The decision was made to split cannabis in 2, and it is completely wrong to redirect marijuana to only half the article. That is why there is a disambiguation page. --SqueakBox 15:01, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree with you, the term "marijuana" usually refers to the drug. It's not a big deal though, I think redirecting to the disambig page is fine too. Rhobite 19:22, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
This addition (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marijuana&diff=14251208&oldid=14249420), if it isn't a copyvio, ought to be merged into cannabis (drug). — Trilobite (Talk) 06:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
- I agree... I think this should turn into a disambiguation page and then we can merge parts of this new text (copyvio?) into other articles. — oo64eva (Alex) (U | T | C) @ 07:12, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
The article does seem now to contain a lot of unnecessary duplication of material from other articles, or material which should be worked into other articles. Laurel Bush 13:56, 26 May 2005 (UTC).
- Cannabis has an almost identical disambig page, and there is extensive discussion on that talk page about redirecting marijuana to cannabis so I'm going to be bold and do so.