Talk:Creative Commons
|
|
Is this just an advertisement for a start-up company, or is something genuinely worth mentioning?
CC was founded in 2001, but it arguably was "launched" in 2002.
- Creative Commons is a non-profit organisation, funded entirely by grants and donations from the public.
- It's not an ad, it is genuinely worth mentioning.
| Contents |
Which book was published first?
I added comment on Prof. Lessig's Free Culture and ESR's The Cathedral And the Bazaar to see if anyone can confirm which one was published commercially first, and also if Tim O'Reilly's book publisher is considered a 'major publisher' or not.
- I'd say they certainly are. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:05, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
pictures
How come the pictures are missing? Bawolff 00:24, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Differences between version 1 and 2
Does anyone know what the differences between version 1 and 2 are?
CC: partnership with spammers ;((
I just don't know how to tell this (http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/41672) without using words like fuck. So, excuse me that I didn't change the article in response to this.
Criticism
Like the arguments here (http://zesty.ca/cc.html) and the above posters link. - Omegatron 19:33, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
Shortening list
The long list of CC-licensed content seemed kind of silly to me. Some of it was pretty obscure, and may have been link spam. I've drastically shortened it. If other people disagree with me, please feel free to add back in any entries that they feel are really well known and important.--Bcrowell 04:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)