Economy of Turkey
|
Economy of Turkey | ||
---|---|---|
Currency | 1 New Turkish Lira = 100 kurus | |
Fiscal year | calendar year | |
Trade Organisations | WTO and OECD, customs union with the EU | |
Statistics | ||
GDP Ranking (2005) | 21st (nominal)by volume; 63rd per capita (nominal) | |
GDP (2005) | $340.3bn (nominal) | |
GDP growth rate (2004) | 8.9% | |
GDP per Capita (2005) | $4,744 | |
GDP by sector (2003) | agriculture (11.7%), industry (29.8%), services (58.5%) | |
Inflation rate (2004) | 9.4% | |
Pop below poverty line (2001) | 18% | |
Labour force (2003) | 23.7m | |
Labour force by occupation (2001) | services (37.9%), industry (22.4%), agriculture (39.7%) | |
Unemployment rate (2003) | 10.5% | |
Main Industries | textiles, food processing, autos, mining (coal, chromite, copper, boron), steel, petroleum, construction, lumber, paper | |
Trading Partners | ||
Imports (2005 est) | $104bn | |
Main Partners (2003) | Germany 13.6%, Russia 7.8%, USA 5.0%, UK 5.0%, France 6.0%, Italy 7.9%, Switzerland 4.3% | |
Exports (2005 est.) | $70bn | |
Main Partners (2003) | Germany 15.8%, USA 8.0%, UK 7.8%, France 6.0%, Italy 6.8% | |
Public Debt | 78.7% of GDP (2003) |
Turkey began a series of reforms in the 1980s designed to shift the economy from a statist, insulated system to a more private-sector, market-based model. The reforms spurred growth, but growth was punctuated by sharp recessions and financial crises in 1994, 1999, and 2001. Turkey's failure to pursue additional reforms, combined with large and growing public sector deficits, resulted in high inflation, increasing macroeconomic volatility, and a weak banking sector.
The Ecevit government, in power from 1999 through 2002, restarted structural reforms in line with ongoing economic programs under the standby agreements signed with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), including passage of social security reform, public finance reform, state banks reform, banking sector reform, increasing transparency in public sector, and also introduction of related legislation to liberalize telecom, and energy markets. Under the IMF program, the government also sought to use exchange rate policies to curb inflation.
By late 2000, a growing current account deficit, the weak banking system, and growing concern over the failure to implement needed structural reforms resulted in a liquidity crisis that led to a revised IMF program. In February 2001, a public dispute between the president and prime minister triggered a run on the lira and a dramatic increase in interest rates. The result was rapid inflation, a severe banking crisis, a massive rise in domestic public debt, and a deep economic downturn (GNP fell 9.5% in 2001). The government was forced to float the lira and adopt a more ambitious economic reform program, including a very tight fiscal policy, enhanced structural reforms, and unprecedented levels of IMF lending.
Large IMF loans--tied to implementation of ambitious economic reforms--enabled Turkey to stabilize interest rates and the currency and to meet its debt obligations. In 2002 and 2003, the reforms began to show results. With the exception of a period of market jitters in the run-up to the Iraq war, inflation and interest rates have fallen significantly, the currency has stabilized, and confidence has begun to return. Nonetheless, the economy remains very fragile, and continued implementation of reforms is essential to sustain growth and stability. On July 29, 2004 the IMF cleared a further disbursement totalling 661 million dollars, as part of an economic aid package approved two years earlier.
Turkey has a number of bilateral investment and tax treaties, including with the United States, that guarantee free repatriation of capital in convertible currencies and eliminate double taxation. Nonetheless, foreign direct investment has totaled only $15.7 billion as of November 2002, a modest sum reflecting investor concerns about political and macroeconomic uncertainty, burdensome regulation, and a large state role in the economy.
Turkey seeks to improve its investment climate through administrative streamlining, an end to foreign investment screening, and strengthened intellectual property legislation. However, a number of disputes involving foreign investors in Turkey and certain policies, such as high taxation of cola products and continuing gaps in the intellectual property regime, inhibit investment. The Turkish privatization board is in the process of privatizing a series of state-owned companies, including the state alcohol and tobacco company and the oil refining parastatal. In 2004, the Privatization Board privatized the telephone company and some of the state-owned banks. The government also committed in the World Trade Organization to liberalize the telecommunications sector at the beginning of 2004.
On January 1st 2005 the Turkish Lira was replaced by the New Turkish Lira, at an exchange rate of 1 new lira to 1,000,000 old. This was to demonstrate the stablisation achieved by the currency in recent years, and to help promote exchange, investment and trade.
See also
External links
- ISE National-100 (http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=%5EXU100&t=my&l=off&z=m&q=l&c=%5EGSPC)
- Deutsche Bank Research (http://www.dbresearch.com/servlet/reweb2.ReWEB?rwkey=u915)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) | |
Australia | Austria | Belgium | Canada | Czech Republic | Denmark | Finland | France | Germany | Greece | Hungary | Iceland | Ireland | Italy | Japan | South Korea | Luxembourg | Mexico | Netherlands | New Zealand | Norway | Poland | Portugal | Slovakia | Spain | Sweden | Switzerland | Turkey | United Kingdom | United States |