User talk:Zestauferov
|
|
1
- A says X is 1
- B says X is not 1
- C claims no knowledge about what X is.
Q. Logically which one A, B or C is free from the burden of proof?
A. C
2
- A provides one source for a view which is also accurate.
- B provides many sources for a view but none of them are accurate.
- C has no opinion, reads A's and B's opinion but does not know which to believe.
Q. Logically on which one A, B or C is the burden of verifying evidence?
A. C
==
In wiki logic B wins every time The burden is always on A and the importance of C's neutrality is mocked. Until wikipedia is governed by Logic I can not write here anymore. I hear some of you say something along the lines of Hurray! If so then by your own thoughts you are identified as enemies of logic.
For the rest of you please send me an email rather than post a message for me here.
Zestauferov 00:08, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Khazars
Khazars is up for nomination on Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates. Since you were involved in some discussions I thought you would be interested. Your vote and/or comments would be appreciated. Thanks! --Briangotts 15:59, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
AMA Meeting Proposal
Hi! I put together a proposal for another AMA meeting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AMA_Meeting_%28suggested_topics%29#New_Membership_Meeting_Call) that I'm hopeful you can chime in on. --Wgfinley 20:21, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)