User:Sam Spade/Mediation with Bryan
|
|
| Contents |
Requests specific to Bryan
- That Bryan and I refrain from reverting one another.
- That Bryan and I avoid one another.
- That Bryan and I not inspect one another’s contributions lists, nor seek out pages primarily with the hopes of finding the other.
Over all request
That religious pages using the word God have a uniform approach to the one settled on by myself and user:eloquence in the article atheism.
Reasoning
I did not engage in revert wars with non-vandals prior to having met Bryan. I have since joined the Wikipedia:Harmonious editing club, and recommend Bryan do likewise. I have found Bryan to be unable to understand references, or their importance. Specifically these three [1] (http://encyclopedia.com/html/a1/atheism.asp) [2] (http://www.bartleby.com/65/at/atheism.html) [3] (http://reference.allrefer.com/encyclopedia/A/atheism.html) have been particularly difficult for him to understand, and [4] (http://www.studylight.org/enc/isb/view.cgi?number=T936) practically disgusted him due to it's being from a religious source, presenting him with the opportunity to use it later as a point of ridicule. His offensive unwillingness to stop mentioning my surname is well documented as well. I am pretty sure he is willing to readily admit to all of this, with the obvious exception of his inability to understand reference materials, something I can sadly say he is not alone in, and which you might find ample proof of below. There are other examples, including the latest of talk:atheism, but the below is perhaps his finest. There is also the simple fact that I do not find communicating with him to be functional, pleasant, or productive.
Examples
[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Atheism/Archive_5#read_some_sources) regarding Sources
Success!
Mediation has successfully resolved these issues, both parties were model participants in the mediation process. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 18:18, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)