Talk:Princes in the Tower
|
|
The reference to the United States Supreme Court seems Anachronistic, Americo-centric and totally out of place. Mintguy 14:54 Dec 2, 2002 (UTC)
The statement that "in fact, such a promise was enforceable in many states of the U.S., and in some of them "breach of promise" to marry was a crime, until the late 20th century" seems similarly irrelevant. It should be replaced by some statement about mediaeval English law, but I know nothing about that subject myself, so I'll leave it for now. Does anyone else have any ideas? -- Oliver PEREIRA 23:44 Jan 16, 2003 (UTC)