Talk:List of alleged conspiracy theories
|
|
IF secret societies want to build a New World Order (conspiracy) by terrorism and force and illnesses
AND IF "5312" is a "secret number" of them (presumed for example by: http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/33rd_Initiation.htm)
AND IF this could be translated in 12005 (read backwards)
AND IF secret societies want to be recognized by secret numbers
then March 12 possibly could be a day of terrorism again. Are the authorities aware of this date? What do you think about? If this speculation was right, what could we do (it's tomorrow)?
I'm a little concerned at the removal of the multinational corporation section. While there are bad things that MNs are up to, there are also wild conspiracy theories about bad things that MNs are up to. Mark Richards 23:31, 24 May 2004 (UTC)
- Maybe an example could be put there? I dunno, when I saw that, it just looked like someone was saying that critics of corporate globalization are whacko conspiracy theorists (it is common for people to claim that everyone on the radical left is a conspiracy theorist, which is unfounded and kind of insulting..). I've never heard a "wild conspiracy theory" regarding them... --Tothebarricades.tk 00:11, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
Fair enough - take it out unless there is an example. Mark Richards 17:49, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
javier solana
I vote to remove this section. There is no evidence that that conspiracy is believed by anyone other than the author (POV) who wrote it. The article they reference is VfD anyway. Goferwiki 23:13, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC).
- It was me who put it there actually, and I am definitely not a believer in this theory. It is also at antichrist and Mark of the Beast. i think when the article goes they should all be removed, --SqueakBox 23:20, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
Debate on "Conspiracy Theory" in Wiki page titles
There is a new page, Wikipedia:Conspiracy_theory where there is going to be a larger discussion of the use of the term "Conspiracy Theory" in Wiki titles. It would be ideal if people with a variety of viewpoints joined the discussion on that page, since a number of page titles are likely to be discussed, and name changes debated.--Cberlet 20:13, 2 May 2005 (UTC)