Talk:Lake monster
|
|
I thought of moving this to "lake monster" (singular). I'm not sure why I hesitated this time. Thoughts? Michael Hardy 21:44 11 Jul 2003 (UTC)
- I went ahead and moved it. I don't think this article should even exist, but if it does, it should follow naming policy. -- Wapcaplet 01:03 12 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Heh. I actually thought you were serious when you suggested it at talk:sea monster. :-) Evercat 01:04 12 Jul 2003 (UTC)
- Surely the Bathtub monster should have given it away? :) -- Wapcaplet 01:06 12 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Is that like some fierce and angry rubber duck? Evercat 01:06 12 Jul 2003 (UTC)
- Some accounts (http://eric.indiana.edu/www/famres/pctogeth/ish03/monster.html) have it that bathtub monsters are adorable and modest creatures who are wont to hog the cleaning products, and may have a penchant for raiding the fridge. Others (http://reallyscary0.tripod.com/srs/id63.html) depict the bathtub monster as a slime-covered animal with a single horn and glassy eyes. Another account (http://www.petsmart.com/acme_pet/features/pet_pourri/articles/article_4629.shtml) tells of a ravenous, shrieking animal that turns out to be merely a household cat. There is much to say on the subject of bathtub monsters. -- Wapcaplet 01:14 12 Jul 2003 (UTC)
I see no reason to have 2 separate articles called lake monster and sea monster. I would like to consolidate the articles, and jest list all the famous mythological and fabulous aquatic beasts of folklore and legend in a single article. I am sure we can make clear that Loch Ness is more of a "lake" than a "sea" -- but it doesn't require an entire separate article to preserve that distinction. Uncle Ed 13:38 16 Jul 2003 (UTC)
This should be merged into sea monster Pizza Puzzle