Talk:Diabolical signature
|
|
Should this be merged with Seal of the demons? -- Error
The first paragraph does not make sense. It is the signature of a demon, but Dr. Faustus signed it? Dr. Faustus was not a demon. Did the contract require the signatures of both Dr. Faustus and the demon? Perhaps, but the one who was selling his soul was not the one whose signature was diabolical. (Contrary to what the paragraph seems to imply.) Michael Hardy 23:51, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)