Talk:Crystal structure
|
|
I suggest adding "lattice constant" or "grating constant". I just do not know the exact name for it in english (whether the name in materials or optics) and I am not sure about adding it with definition in the article or link it to an own one. what do yo think?
--morgenrot42 23:12, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
the idea was to delete that page, then to rename the" mineral structure" -> "crystal structure".
But suit yourself. If you do it, it will take one second
if I do, it will take maybe two weeks. So do as you wish.
I'll put it on the vote for deletion as usual
ant
- There is no "what the hell". If the history (at least of the richest article) has to be preserved, and the two pages exist at the same time, I cannot do a redirect to an already existing page. Right ? And I cannot delete a page either. So, what I have been doing for a year now, is either to drop the subject as it is very relaxing to do so, or to head for the votes for deletion page to have one of the pages deleted. Wait until someone is kind enough to do it, then make the move. That is precisely what any non-sysop user has to do each time he wants to do something similar :-)
Replaced mav's diagrams with smoother ones, and added the missing ones. I'm no crystallographer, so let me know if I did something wrong with them -- DrBob 02:25, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
- I'm not a crystallographer either, but they look great to me! The only nitpick I have is that the difference between triclinic and rhombohedral is that all the sides are the same in rhombohedral. It's reasonably clear in the diagram, but could you add a little a next to each side of mav's rhombohedral diagram? Tantalate 19:48, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
- OK, I've uploaded a tweaked version -- DrBob 20:02, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks awesome! Tantalate 20:37, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
It would be nice to have the pictures at Wikipedia-Commons. --80.185.28.63 11:13, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)