Talk:BSD license
|
|
--145.254.233.213 05:02, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC) minor text revs for smoother reading (trying to be WikiGnoming):
- add forward ref to the first mentioning of "advertising clause" for better reading (sudden use of terms explained only later should be forward referenced)
- "The BSD License does not prohibit the use ... A notable example of such use is ..." (Substituted such use for this because using this is inaccurate, although this advancement costs a duplication of the word use.)
- re-spelled "BSD License Template"
- NOTE: The meanining of, the clause deletes the third section, seems unclear to me. Could the Original author of that phrase please clarify ? (Did you mean to say, the third section of the clause is deleted or something like that? While I don't know about the intricacies of the licenses in question, it seems strange to me that a non-present clause (the third one necessarily omitted from a 2-clause vs. the 3-clause version) should be able to "do" something ("delete" a section or anything)).