Talk:Antiparticle
|
|
The spin of an antiparticle is equal to the spin of the corresponding particle, not its negative. In fact, the spin is never negative, only its projection can be nagative. I corrected the first paragraph accordingly.
Elad Tsur May 25 08:08:56 UTC 2005
"below addition by xxxx" not necessary Mark - keeping it unattributed is part of the deal. The record does show which user writes what though, and youd be wise to log in under a name (whatever it may be) to establish some sort of identity. This helps in a number of ways - including in our ability to talk to you through your talk page.
Best, 豎眩sv
Somebody just added a page for Chung-Yao Chao, and claims he's the discoverer of the first antiparticle, while this page says it's Carl Andersen. Is the Chao page a hoax? -- Walt Pohl 07:40, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Sources are spare, but it may be the case he was a student working at Andersen group. --Pjacobi 09:12, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Color charge
Color charge is not a scalar which is negated for an antiparticle. Quarks lie in the 3 of color and antiquarks in the 3*. Gluons are not necessarily their own anti-particles, since their C parity is undefined, but they all lie in the 8 of color. I've removed the misleading references to color charge here. If someone wants to put it back, it should be discussed better. Bambaiah 06:26, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)