Ice core

Ice Core sample taken from drill. Photo by Lonnie Thompson, Byrd Polar Research Center.

An ice core is a cylinder of ice removed from an ice sheet. It is collected by driving a hollow tube or by core drilling deep into an ice sheet, most commonly in the polar ice caps of Antarctica, Greenland or in high mountain glaciers elsewhere. As the ice sheet forms from the incremental buildup of annual layers of snow, lower layers are older than those on top, and an ice core contains ice formed over a range of years. The properties of the ice can then be used to reconstruct a climatic record over the age range of the core.

Ice cores contain an abundance of climate information as almost everything that fell in the snow that year remains behind, including wind-blown dust, ash, atmospheric gases and radioactivity. The variety of climatic proxies is greater than in any other natural recorder of climate such as tree rings or sediment layers. These include (proxies for) temperature, ocean volume, precipitation, chemistry and gas composition of the lower atmosphere, volcanic eruptions, solar variability, sea-surface productivity, desert extent and forest fires.

The length of the record depends on the depth of the ice core and varies from a few years up to 800 kyr for the EPICA core. The time resolution (i.e. the shortest time period which can be accurately distinguished) depends on the amount of annual snowfall, and reduces with depth as the ice compacts under the weight of layers accumulating on top of it. Upper layers of ice in a core corresponds to a single year or sometimes a single season. Deeper into the ice the layers thin and annual layers become indistinguishable.

An ice core from the right site can be used to reconstruct an uninterrupted and detailed climate record extending over hundreds of thousands of years, providing information on a wide variety of aspects of climate at each point in time. It is the simultaneity of these properties recorded in the ice that makes ice cores such a powerful tool in paleoclimate research.

Structure of ice sheets and cores

Most ice sheets are formed from snow. Because an ice sheet survives summer, the temperature in that location usually does not warm much above freezing. In many locations in Antarctica the air temperature is always well below the freezing point of water. If the summer temperatures do get above freezing, any ice core record will be severely degraded or completely useless, since meltwater will percolate into the snow.

The surface layer is snow in various forms, with air gaps between snowflakes. As snow continues to accumulate, the buried snow is compressed and forms firn, a grainy material with a texture similar to granulated sugar. Air gaps remain, and some circulation of air continues. As snow accumulates above, the firn continues to densify, and at some point the pores close off and the air is trapped. Because the air continues to circulate until then, the ice age and the age of the gas enclosed are not the same, and may differ by as much as 156 years. [1] (http://www.darenet.nl/nl/page/repository.item/show?identifier=hdl:1874/1104&repository=uu24).

Under increasing pressure, at some depth the firn is compressed into ice. This depth may range between a few to several tens of meters to typically 100 m for Antarctic cores. Below this level material is frozen in the ice. Ice may appear clear or blue.

Layers can be visually distinguished in firn and in ice to significant depths. In a location on the summit of an ice sheet where there is little flow, accumulation tends to move down and away, creating layers with minimal disturbance. In a location where underlying ice is flowing, deeper layers may have increasingly different characteristics and distortion. Drill cores near bedrock often are challenging to analyze due to distorted flow patterns and composition likely to include materials from the underlying surface.

Characteristics of firn

The layer of porous firn on Antarctic ice sheets is 50-150m deep. [4] (http://www.darenet.nl/nl/page/repository.item/show?identifier=hdl:1874/1104&repository=uu24) It is much less deep on glaciers.

Air in the atmosphere and firn are slowly exchanged by molecular diffusion through pore spaces, because gases move toward regions of lower concentration. Thermal diffusion causes isotope fractionation in firn when there is rapid temperature variation, creating isotope differences which are captured in bubbles when ice is created at the base of firn. There is gas movement due to diffusion in firn, but not convection except very near the surface.

Below the firn is a zone in which seasonal layers alternately have open and closed porosity. These layers are sealed with respect to diffusion. Gas ages increase rapidly with depth in these layers. Various gases are fractionated while bubbles are trapped where firn is converted to ice. [5] (http://nigec.ucdavis.edu/publications/ar/annual99/northeast/NEBender0.html)

Coring

A core is collected by separating it from the surrounding material. For material which is sufficiently soft, coring may be done with a hollow tube. Deep core drilling into hard ice, and perhaps underlying bedrock, involves using a hollow drill which actively cuts a cylindrical pathway downward around the core.

When a drill is used, the cutting apparatus is on the bottom end of a drill barrel, the tube which surrounds the core as the drill cuts downward around the edge of the cylindrical core. The length of the drill barrel determines the maximum length of a core sample (6 m at GISP2 and Vostok). Collection of a long core record thus requires many cycles of lowering a drill/barrel assembly, cutting a core 4-6m in length, raising the assembly to the surface, emptying the core barrel, and preparing a drill/barrel for drilling.

Because deep ice is under pressure and can deform, for cores deeper than about 300m the hole will tend to close if there is nothing to supply back pressure. The hole is filled with a fluid to keep the hole from closing. The fluid, or mixture of fluids, must simultaneously satisfy criteria for density, low viscosity, frost resistance, as well as workplace safety and environmental compliance. The fluid must also satisfy other criteria, for example those stemming from the analytical methods employed on the ice core. A number of different fluids and fluid combinations have been tried in the past. Since GISP2 (1990-1993) the US Polar Program has utilized a single-component fluid system, n-butyl acetate, but the toxicology, flammability, aggressive solvent nature, and longterm liabilities of n-butyl acetate raises serious questions about its continued application. The European community, including the Russian program, has concentrated on the use of two-component drilling fluid consisting of low-density hydrocarbon base (brown kerosene was used at Vostok) boosted to the density of ice by addition of halogenated-hydrocarbon densifier. Many of the proven densifier products are now considered too toxic, or are no longer available due to efforts to enforce the Montreal Protocol on ozone-depleting substances [6] (http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/icds/reports/Drill_Fluid.pdf). In April 1998 on the Devon Ice Cap filtered lamp oil was used as a drilling fluid. In the Devon core it was observed that below about 150 m the stratigraphy was obscured by microfractures [7] (http://pubs.usgs.gov/prof/p1386j/history/history-lores.pdf)

Core processing

Modern practice is to ensure that cores remain uncontaminated, since they are analysed for trace quantities of chemicals and isotopes. They are sealed in plastic bags after drilling and analysed in clean rooms.

The core is carefully extruded from the barrel; often facilities are designed to accommodate the entire length of the core on a horizontal surface. Drilling fluid will be cleaned off before the core is cut into 1-2 meter sections. Various measurements may be taken during preliminary core processing.

Current practices to avoid contamination of ice include:

• Keeping ice well below the freezing point.
  • At Greenland and Antarctic sites, temperature is maintained by having storage and work areas under the snow/ice surface.
  • At GISP2, cores were never allowed to rise above -15°C, partly to prevent microcracks from forming and allowing present-day air to contaminate the fossil air trapped in the ice fabric, and partly to inhibit recrystallization of the ice structure.
• Wearing special clean suits over cold weather clothing.
• Mittens or gloves.
• Filtered respirators.
• Plastic bags, often polyethylene, around ice cores. Some drill barrels include a liner.
• Proper cleaning of tools and laboratory equipment.
• Use of laminar-flow bench to isolate core from room particulates.

For shipping, cores are packed in Styrofoam boxes protected by shock absorbing bubble-wrap.

Due to the many types of analysis done on core samples, sections of the core are scheduled for specific uses. After the core is ready for further analysis, each section is cut as required for tests. Some testing is done on site, other study will be done later, and a significant fraction of each core segment is reserved for archival storage for future needs.

Projects have used different core-processing strategies. Some projects have only done studies of physical properties in the field, while others have done significantly more study in the field. These differences are reflected in the core processing facilities.

Ice relaxation

Deep ice is under great pressure. When brought to the surface, there is a drastic change in pressure. Due to the internal pressure and varying composition, particularly bubbles, sometimes cores are very brittle and can break or shatter during handling. At Dome C, the first 1000 m were brittle ice. Siple dome encountered it from 400 to 1000 m. It has been found that allowing ice cores to rest for some time (sometimes for a year) makes them become much less brittle.

Decompression causes significant volume expansion (called relaxation) due to microcracking and the exsolving of enclathratized gases.[8] (http://www.gisp2.sr.unh.edu/GISP2/Contri_Series/full/09.html#8) Relaxation may last for months. [[9] (http://www.gisp2.sr.unh.edu/GISP2/PERSONALHTML/ajgow.html)] During this time, ice cores are stored below -10°C to prevent cracking due to expansion at higher temperatures. At drilling sites, a relaxation area is often built within existing ice at a depth which allows ice core storage at temperatures below -20°C.

It has been observed that the internal structure of ice undergoes distinct changes during relaxation. Changes include much more pronounced cloudy bands and much higher density of "white patches" and bubbles.Template:Ref

Several techniques have been examined. Cores obtained by hot water drilling at Siple Dome in 1997-1998 underwent appreciably more relaxation than cores obtained with the PICO electro-mechanical drill. In addition, the fact that cores were allowed to remain at the surface at elevated temperature for several days likely promoted the onset of rapid relaxation. [10] (http://waiscores.dri.edu/MajorFindings/MeeseGowRes.html)

Ice core data

Graph of CO₂ (green), reconstructed temperature (blue) and dust (red) from the Vostok ice core for the past 420,000 years

Many materials can appear in an ice core. Layers can be measured in several ways to identify changes in composition. Small meteorites may be embedded in the ice. Volcanic eruptions leave identifiable ash layers. Dust in the core can be linked to increased desert area or wind speed.

Isotopic analysis of the ice in the core can be linked to temperature and global sea level variations. Analysis of the air contained in bubbles in the ice can reveal the palaeocomposition of the atmosphere, in particular CO₂ variations. Beryllium 10 concentrations are linked to cosmic ray intensity which can be a proxy for solar strength. See proxy.

There may be an association between atmospheric nitrates in ice and solar activity. However, recently it was discovered that sunlight triggers chemical changes within top levels of firn which significantly alter the pore air composition. This raises levels of formaldehyde and NOx. Although the remaining levels of nitrates may indeed be indicators of solar activity, there is ongoing investigation of resulting and related effects of effects upon ice core data.[11] (http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/990315.Shepson.arctic.html)[12] (http://home.earthlink.net/~nicolablake/n_pages/Summit_ACS.html)

Core contamination

Some contamination has been detected in ice cores. The levels of lead on the outside of ice cores is much higher than on the inside.Template:Ref In ice from the Vostok core (Antarctica), the outer portion of the cores have up to 3 and 2 orders of magnitude higher bacterial density and dissolved organic carbon than the inner portion of the cores, respectively, as a result of drilling and handling.Template:Ref

Paleoatmospheric sampling

As porous snow consolidates into ice, the air within it is trapped in bubbles in the ice. This process continuously preserves samples of the atmosphere.Template:Ref In order to retrieve these natural samples the ice is ground at low temperatures, allowing the trapped air to escape. It is then condensed for analysis by gas chromatography or mass spectrometry, revealing gas concentrations and their isotopic composition respectively. Apart from the intrinsic importance of knowing relative gas concentrations (e.g. to estimate the extent of greenhouse warming), their isotopic composition can provide information on the sources of gases. For example CO₂ from fossil-fuel or biomass burning is relatively depleted in ¹³C. See Friedli et al., 1986.

Dating the air with respect to the ice it is trapped in is problematic. The consolidation of snow to ice necessary to trap the air takes place at depth (the 'trapping depth') once the pressure of overlying snow is great enough. Since air can freely diffuse from the overlying atmosphere throughout the upper unconsolidated layer (the 'firn'), trapped air is younger than the ice surrounding it.

Trapping depth varies with climatic conditions, so the air-ice age difference could vary between 2500 and 6000 years (Barnola et al., 1991). However, air from the overlying atmosphere may not mix uniformly throughout the firn (Battle et al., 1986) as earlier assumed, meaning estimates of the air-ice age difference could be less than imagined. Either way, this age difference is a critical uncertainty in dating ice-core air samples. In addition, gas movement would be different for various gases; for example, larger molecules would be unable to move at a different depth than smaller molecules so the ages of gases at a certain depth may be different. Some gases also have characteristics which affect their inclusion, such as helium not being trapped because it is soluble in ice.

In Law Dome ice cores, the trapping depth at DE08 was found to be 72 m where the age of the ice is 40±1 years; at DE08-2 to be 72 m depth and 40 years; and at DSS to be 66 m depth and 68 years.[13] (http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/lawdome.html)

Paleoatmospheric firn studies

At the South Pole, the firn-ice transition depth is at 122 m, with a CO₂ age of about 100 years. Gases involved in ozone depletion, CFCs, chlorocarbons, and bromocarbons, were measured in firn and levels were almost zero at around 1880 except for CH₃Br, which is known to have natural sources.[14] (http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/publications/annrpt23/chapter5_6.htm) Similar study of Greenland firn found that CFCs vanished at a depth of 69m (CO₂ age of 1929).[15] (http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/assessments/assess_99/tgases.html#cfc)

Analysis of the Upper Fremont Glacier ice core showed large levels of chlorine-36 that definitely correspond to the production of that isotope during atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons. This result is interesting because the signal exists despite being on a glacier and undergoing the effects of thawing, refreezing, and associated meltwater percolation.[16] (http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/SW_corrosion/icecore/futurework.shtml) ³⁶Cl has also been detected in the Dye-3 ice core (Greenland)[17] (http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~eih/ch7/7-Cl36.htm), and in firn at Vostok. Template:Doi

Studies of gases in firn often involve estimates of changes in gases due to physical processes such as diffusion. However, it has been noted that there also are populations of bacteria in surface snow and firn at the South Pole, although this study has been challenged. [18] (http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/66/10/4514) [19] (http://aem.asm.org/cgi/content/full/69/10/6340?view=long&pmid=14532104) It had previously been pointed out that anomalies in some trace gases may be explained as due to accumulation of in-situ metabolic trace gas byproducts. [20] (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2003EAEJA.....1994S&db_key=PHY)

Dating cores

Shallow cores, or the upper parts of cores in high-accumulation areas, can be dated exactly by counting individual layers, each representing a year. These layers may be visible, related to the nature of the ice; or they may be chemical, related to differential transport in different seasons; or they may be isotopic, reflecting the annual temperature signal (for example, snow from colder periods has more of the heavier isotopes of H and O). Deeper into the core the layers thin out due to ice flow and eventually individual years cannot be distinguished. It may be possible to identify events such as nuclear bomb atmospheric testing's radioisotope layers in the upper levels, and ash layers corresponding to known volcanic eruptions. Volcanic eruptions may be detected by visible ash layers, acidic chemistry, or electrical resistance change. Some composition changes are detected by high-resolution scans of electrical resistance. Lower down the ages are reconstructed by modelling accumulation rate variations and ice flow.

Dating is a difficult task. Five different dating methods have been used for Vostok cores, with differences such as 300 years at 100m depth, 600yr at 200m, 7000yr at 400m, 5000yr at 800m, 6000yr at 1600m, and 5000yr at 1934m. [21] (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/icecore/antarctica/vostok/vostok_timescales.html)

Different dating methods makes comparison and interpretation difficult. Matching peaks by visual examination of Moulton and Vostok ice cores suggests a time difference of about 10,000 years but proper interpretation requires knowing the reasons for the differences. [22] (http://www.geosc.psu.edu/~sowers/research.html)

Ice core sites

Ice cores have been taken from many locations around the world. Major efforts have taken place on Greenland and Antarctica.

Sites on Greenland are more susceptible to snow melt than those in Antarctica. In the Antarctic, areas around the Antarctic Peninsula and seas to the west have been found to be affected by ENSO effects. Both of these characteristics have been used to study such variations over long spans of time [23] (http://waiscores.dri.edu/MajorFindings/WhiteRes.html).

Greenland

GRIP/GISP

Template:Seemain2

The GRIP and GISP cores, each about 3000 m long, were drilled by European and US teams respectively on the summit of Greenland. Their usable record stretches back more than 100,000 years into the last interglacial. They agree (in the climatic history recovered) to a few meters above bedrock. However the lowest portion of these cores cannot be interpreted, probably due to disturbed flow close to the bedrock. [24] (http://www.agu.org/revgeophys/mayews01/node8.html) There is evidence the GISP2 cores contain an increasing structural disturbance which casts suspicion on features lasting centuries or more in the bottom 10% of the ice sheet Template:Ref. The results indicate that Holocene climate has been remarkably stable and have confirmed the occurrence of rapid climatic variation during the last ice age.

NGRIP

The NGRIP drilling site is near the center of Greenland (75.1 N, 42.32 W, 2917 m, ice thickness 3085). Drilling began in 1999 and was completed at bedrock in 2003. The cores are cylinders of ice four inches in diameter that were brought to the surface in 3.5-meter lengths.

The NGRIP record helps to resolve a problem with the GRIP record - the unreliability of the Eemian interglacial portion of the record. NGRIP covers 5 kyr of the Eemian, and shows that temperatures then were roughly as stable as the pre-industrial Holocene temperatures were. This is confirmed by sediment cores, in particular MD95-2042.

In 2003, the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP) recovered what seem to be plant remnants nearly two miles below the surface, and they may be several million years old. [25] (http://www.glaciology.gfy.ku.dk/ngrip/index_eng.htm)

"Several of the pieces look very much like blades of grass or pine needles," said University of Colorado at Boulder geological sciences Professor James White, an NGRIP principal investigator. "If confirmed, this will be the first organic material ever recovered from a deep ice-core drilling project," he said.

Antarctica

Vostok

Up to 2003, the longest core drilled was at Vostok station. It reached back 420,000 years and revealed 4 past glacial cycles. Drilling stopped just above Lake Vostok. The Vostok core was not drilled at a summit, hence ice from deeper down has flowed from upslope; this slightly complicates dating and interpretation. Vostok core data is available [26] (http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/icecore/antarctica/vostok/vostok.html).

EPICA/Dome C

The EPICA core in Antarctica was drilled at 75°S, 123°E (560 km from Vostok) at an altitude of 3,233 m, near Dome C. The ice thickness is 3,309 +/-22 m and the core was drilled to 3,190 m. Present-day annual average air temperature is -54.5°C and snow accumulation 25 mm/y. Information about the core was first published in Nature on 2004/June/10. The core went back 720,000 years and revealed 8 previous glacial cycles.

External links

• Ice Core Gateway (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/icgate.html)
• National Ice Core Laboratory (http://nicl.usgs.gov/): facility for storing, curating, and studying ice cores recovered from the polar regions of the world.
• "Frozen time" (http://www.nature.com/nsu/040607/040607-4.html) from Nature (journal)
• "Oldest ever ice core promises climate revelations" (http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994121) - from New Scientist
• "Ice cores unlock climate secrets" (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3792209.stm) from the BBC
• "New Ice Core Record Will Help Understanding of Ice Ages, Global Warming" (http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/MediaAlerts/2004/2004060917108.html) from NASA
• Ice-core evidence of rapid climate shift during the termination of the Little Ice Age (http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/SW_corrosion/icecore/index.html) - Upper Fremont Glacier study

References

• http://www.tonderai.co.uk/earth/ice_cores.php "The Chemistry of Ice Cores" literature review
• BARNOLA, J., PIMIENTA, P., RAYNAUD, D. and KOROTKEVICH, Y. CO2-CLIMATE RELATIONSHIP AS DEDUCED FROM THE VOSTOK ICE CORE - A REEXAMINATION BASED ON NEW MEASUREMENts AND ON A REEVALUATION OF THE AIR DATING. Tellus Series B-Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 43(2):83 -- 90, 1991.
• Battle, M., Bender, M., Sowers, T., Tans, P., Butler, J., Elkins, J., Ellis, J., Conway, T., Zhang, N., Lang, P. and Clarke, A. Atmospheric gas concentrations over the past century measured in air from firn at the South Pole. Nature, 383(6597):231 -- 235, 1996.
• FRIEDLI, H., LOtsCHER, H., OESCHGER, H., SIEGENTHALER, U. and STAUFFER, B. ICE CORE RECORD OF THE C-13/C-12 RATIO OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 IN THE PAST 2 CENTURIES. Nature, 324(6094):237 -- 238, 1986.

• Template:Note Template:Journal reference issue Template:Doi
• Template:Note Template:Journal reference issue Template:Web reference
• Template:Note Template:Journal reference issue Template:Doi
• Template:Note Template:Web reference
• Template:Note Template:Journal reference issue Template:Doi
• NGRIP project members, Nature 2004/09/09: High resolution record of Northern Hemisphere climate extending into the last interglacial period.de:Eisbohrkern

ja:氷床コア