User talk:Vancouverguy
|
|
This a former user's talk page
You uploaded a number of what look like personal photos. They are very good, but unfortunately without information on what license they were released under they are of limited usefulness. If you ever drop by again would you mind tagging them?
Here are seom of them:
- Image:MLatta.JPG
- Image:SLR.jpg
- Image:Swartzbay.JPG
- Image:CTEC.jpg
- Image:Detachablechairlift.jpg
- Image:Chairlift.jpg
- Image:Gondola.JPG
- Image:Riblet.jpg
- Image:Mueller.jpg
- Image:Yandouble.jpg
- Image:Yanexample.JPG
- Image:Whistler3.JPG
- -SimonP 17:20, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new)| talk)
Image:South_Africa_flag%281927%29_large.PNG
To let you know, this image is now on Images for Deletion. I have listed it there, since it has been redrawn and replaced. If you have any questions, come to that page. Zscout370 (talk) 03:15, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)