Talk:Torrijos-Carter Treaties
From Academic Kids
Why did the US agree to do this? - Tεxτurε 20:48, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Sabotage attempt
Since this is discussed in Torrijos' article could we just link to it? CSTAR 23:24, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I don't object. I thought that it gives an insight into Torrijos' fierce nationalism, though. --Herschelkrustofsky 02:07, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
BTW, I found an alternate (I hesitate to say more credible, helas -- the Chicago Tribune. Aug 12, 1990) . For copyright reasons, I won't insert here the complete Trib article. This is the gyst of the article:
According to confiscated documents, Torrijos asked Noriega to draw up plans to sabotage the Panama Canal and attack U.S. military headquarters to insure ratification of the Canal Treaties. Noriega's notes on the plan were found during the 1989 invasion. In August 1990, when the article was written, the files were being held in a warehouse in Corozal, Panama guarded by the U.S. Army.Apparently portions of the plan were published in the September 1990 issue of New York-based Details magaizine (never heard of it) <p> A note in Noriega's handwriting referred to the plan called "Huele A Quemado"; it called for a series of commando units to attack and sabotage the targets. In the Tribune report, it said that acording to Details magazine the plan was continually updated, even after Noriega became head of the PDF. One unit was to attack the lock gates, another the canal locomotives which pulled the ships through the locks. <p> A document marked "SECRETO" said "Mission: Make inoperable the Panama Canal and areas of defense of same," </blockquote> I think that part of the article should be rewritten. For copyright reasons, we also may have to delete this part of the talk page.CSTAR 03:12, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
[edit]More on sabotage
FWIW, here's another citation supporting the threat of sabotage. I have not read the book myself, so I cannot vouch for the correctness of this summary, or for the original author's veracity. It's just something I found on the internet. -Willmcw 21:13, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- U.S. Finds it Difficult to Hand Over the Panama Canal
- By JONATHAN POWER December 29, 1999
- The bitterness ran very deep. A taste of it can be found in Graham Greene's chronicle, "Getting to know the General". In it Greene recounts one of his many intimate conversations with General Omar Torrijos, the military president who negotiated the Panama Canal Treaty face to face with Carter. "The Canal is easy to sabotage", said Torrijos, "Blow a hole in the Gatun dam and the canal will drain down to the Atlantic. It would take only a few days to mend the dam, but it would take three years of rain to fill the canal. During that time it would be guerrilla war waged from the jungle". (The forest and mountains that link Panama and Colombia are among the most impenetrable in the world; and all attempts to link the two countries with a road have failed.)
- Greene became the friend and confidante of Torrijos during the difficult days of the treaty negotiations. He observed that Torrijos "would not be entirely unhappy if the U.S. Senate refused to ratify the Treaty (as it nearly did). He would be left with the simple solution of violence, which had often been in his mind, with desire and apprehension balanced as in a sexual encounter."
- -The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (http://www.transnational.org/forum/power/1999/12panamacanal.html)
