Template:Facfailed
Template:Oldpeerreview
|
|
Pending tasks for [[Template:Articlespace:Singapore]]: (https://academickids.com:443/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Talk:Singapore&action=purge)
| edit (https://academickids.com:443/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Talk:Singapore/to_do&action=edit) - watch (https://academickids.com:443/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Talk:Singapore/to_do&action=watch) - purge (https://academickids.com:443/encyclopedia/index.php?title=Talk:Singapore&action=purge)
|
|
Talk:Singapore/to do
|
urban planning and taxonomical breakdown
As you can see from Wikipedia talk:SGpedians' notice board#Standardisation, I feel mentioning urban planning is very important...it doesn't seem to be mentioned in the Singapore article at all, and also the other reason is that there should be something of the sort "Singapore is divided into 5 urban planning areas", such that the reader can easily flow from the general to the specific in a form of taxonomy. Should this be in the Geography Section? Plus, we can avoid a huge mess of articles of Singapore places (as they all tie in into the main Singapore article hierarchially) in the first place. For example, if you look at the United States of America example, they *do* mention political divisions and mention how they break down, so I'm thinking we can do a parallel, just not as extensive. Any thoughts? I have a plan to create a hierarchial template, and maybe even an entire section for it? -- Natalinasmpf 17:41, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
